To me accidental would be a a failure to control the dogs, malicious would be deliberately setting or encouraging the dogs
To me this is not a moot point.
A dog (or dogs) attacking a child will be equally traumatic whether the attack is accidental or malicious. He point here is that the dogs were not under control and there was a deliberate attempt to remove them.
There is no proof or mention of the time scale here.
I only hope that this was "later" - if this was at the time of the attack, and the owner did not assist the victim then I am speechless!
The owner was a woman and has indeed now been charged
A recent report on google news states "The owner of the animals was seen leaving the area with them in a taxi, but was later traced by police"
Read more: http://www.dailymail...l#ixzz0y96VDM8R
No timing of how long after the event but it would suggest that they did so without contacting the police otherwise they would not have had to be traced. They may have been try to remove the dog to a safer place for the public safety, but it still is a suspect act given the circumstances.
At least now it will go to court when all will be revealed.
In the mean time we can only hope the girl makes a quick and full recovery.