BentMikey said:
Not at all. You're exposing yourself to lots of risk for a sustained period when filtering past a long queue. An overtake like mine has roughly the same level of risk, but for only a very short period of time. All the unusual circumstances you stretched a point with before could be applied just as easily to your filtering, and are more likely there as you interact with more drivers.
I'm not going to go over old ground and discuss a video that was discussed to death! However, risk when overtaking an non-moving queue with traffic that is slow moving coming towards me (the road layout here and the fact that there are a lot of parked cars around dictates that cars approaching tend to be at or under 20mph) is minimal. Of course there is risk, but it is very small, I would never deny that.
At no point in this discussion have I ever said that you were at great risk. What I tried to point out was that I considered that your risk increased with overtaking the car at speed, compared to slowing up behind it. You might disagree, fair enough, but my point of view, I think, is a reasonable one. Looking at risk and benefit, you gained one car and possibly a few seconds for that admittedly small risk.
With regards to my filtering, on that section, I can pass 10-15 cars with minimal risk, and because of the way that the lights ahead work, I can gain about 3-4 minutes (they are on red for quite a long time). So I gain a fair amount for my risk. So all I am saying, and all I have ever tried to point out, is that I would have slowed down there, because I would have perceived the gain to be small and I would have perceived the admittedly small risk as not being worth it.
We all have different thresholds for risk/benefit. For this particular video I obviously have a different threshold to you. I'm not entirely sure why that (appears to have) has wound you up.
I'm sorry if I have.
