True. But as @Drago says.....at least you die with a full noseHasn't alcohol been killing tens of thousands of people since Mankind started riding around on horses and in cars and boats?
Never done drugs.Been there done that.
Addicts will get addicted to anything.
Nothing good will come from class A abuse..add a syringe to the equation and your fooked
I wasn't commenting on the fact that some people who take cocaine die, I was commenting on the fact that many people who get in the way of the cocaine cartels suffer a very unpleasant fate. So, anybody who buys cocaine (or who accepts it from anyone else who has paid for it) is basically giving money to murderous thugs and condoning them mutilating and killing.Hasn't alcohol been killing tens of thousands of people since Mankind started riding around on horses and in cars and boats?
Never done drugs.
Never smoked.
I do drink a tad too much IMO.
But its my understanding that some people are more susceptible to addiction than others eg one fag and they are hooked.
Yes but drug driving is still detectable isn't it? More training and equipment would need to be rolled out to Police but I'm pretty sure it could be detected in the same way. Remember also that there are still many drivers under the influence of alcohol out there who still don't get caught. You can still legalise drugs and make it illegal to operate a vehicle.My main worry with legalising drugs apart from criminals finding other ways to make money is the amount of people under the influence and behind the wheel of motor vehicles, drug driving is a growing problem.
There's a very active market for some prescription only medication.My main worry with legalising drugs apart from criminals finding other ways to make money is the amount of people under the influence and behind the wheel of motor vehicles, drug driving is a growing problem.
Doesn't that assume there'd be more of it post-legalisation? Quite an assumption, given the experience of most countries that have gone the legalisation route, most of which have found on the contrary that use of soft drugs has fallen rather than risen, use of hard drugs even more, since the need to sell drugs to finance one's own addiction is much reduced.My main worry with legalising drugs apart from criminals finding other ways to make money is the amount of people under the influence and behind the wheel of motor vehicles, drug driving is a growing problem.
As ypu know, cannabis is illegal in Holland, but they have zones where people don't get prosecuted for possession, provided they otherwise behave themselves.
Alas, the experiment is faltering. Naughty behaviour related to cannabis use is on the rise, so several zones are being removed, and several more rejigged and reduced in size. The beginning of the end for the Dutch dopehead experiment?
Personally, I couldnt care less if people do it indoors provided they don't commit crime to pay for it, and don't drive etc under the influence. Alas, many people are too stupid to stick to those 2 basic rules.
You can in more than half the states of the US. Sad day when the yanks beat us for open-minded forward-thinking...This is all very confusing for me. Lots of people I've spoken to have said if it's legal, it would be cheaper (less risk etc). But I think if it was only made legal to use/possess the stuff in small quantities, wouldn't the supply chain still be the same i.e. same risk of importing it into the country = same price? I doubt very much if there'll ever be a day when you can buy it from a licensed vendor? And if so, wouldn't demand outstrip supply, so prices would still remain the same?