E Scooter on Trains

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Drago

Legendary Member
True - but you would need to get you understaffed train stations to stop and check every potential ebike
Why would they check every one? A random sample,mor only those thet arouse suspicion would suffice.
and I know that mine if on the bottom of the bracket which I could easily show by turning the bike over
Well done you. Then on the train you shall go, me old mucker.

but my previous bike had a similar sticker - and it could easily have had a dodgy battery stuffed into the battery holder and it would have worked fine
That's what we call a 20p scenario. Heres 20p - call me if it happens.

That some dodgy types might try to commit a criminal act by sneaking a non compliant bike onto a train is no excuse for not making some effort. The fact remains the bulk can be identified va the compliance plate, and those that try to dodge it risk a serious sentence for endangering the railway if it goes wrong.

most people will comply and  most of those that try and be sneaky would be spotted by the plate check. That won't completely eliminate dodgy batteries on trains because selfish chumps walk among us, but it would greatly reduce the numbers and thus greatly reduce the risk.
 

mjr

Comfy armchair to one person & a plank to the next
E-bikes were among the items exempted from the ban - see the bottom of the press release from May 2023:
https://www.greateranglia.co.uk/abo...articles/greater-anglia-ban-e-scooters-1-june
It seems https://www.greateranglia.co.uk/travel-information/your-journey/cycling has changed too. The only quirk I spotted now is that folding e-bikes aren't allowed on bustitutions.

I've seen a few home modified or downright illegal ones onboard that I'd like to have seen refused carriage when I've used GA in the past few years.
Often, such things are not e-bikes, but motorbikes or e-scooters. Calling them "illegal e-bikes" is unhelpful and feeds the hate and punishment against legal e-bikes and their users.
 

mjr

Comfy armchair to one person & a plank to the next
True - but you would need to get you understaffed train stations to stop and check every potential ebike
That sounds like allowing perfection to be the enemy of better. Policing the motorbike ban doesn't have to be perfect. Same as they currently don't police the e-scooter ban perfectly. Heck, they don't police "you must buy a ticket before boarding the train where sales facilities exist" anything like perfectly, but almost nobody argues that it means they can't police it at all.

but my previous bike had a similar sticker - and it could easily have had a dodgy battery stuffed into the battery holder and it would have worked fine
so the plate on the bottom would still be there but would prove nothing
Yes, the batteries should have to have an official sticker with a QR code or similar that can be scanned to validate the battery, but unsafe batteries is a far more general problem than just on trains.
 

N0bodyOfTheGoat

Well-Known Member
Location
Hampshire, UK
Would it help weed out the homebrew ebikes by paying a LBS to inspect ebikes regularly (every 2 years?) and add legit ebikes {and banned homebrews} to a register with photo of ebike, with a QR sticker or code on the ebike, that rail staff could input on the register app?
 
Often, such things are not e-bikes, but motorbikes or e-scooters. Calling them "illegal e-bikes" is unhelpful and feeds the hate and punishment against legal e-bikes and their users.

It would certainly help if the media (etc) would stop referring to transport devices with 2 wheels and an electric motor all in the same way - as ebikes

People on here will generally know that there are legal versions which could more properly referred to as Pedalecs or EPACs

and the ones that are not compliant with these regulation should be referred to as mopeds or motorbikes - the power source is not all that relevant
nor is it relevant that the motor and battery are nailed onto some sort of bicycle


It seems that some of the more responsible media are starting to use better words to describe them but the general public seems to think of them all the same
It will be a slow process to change the way people think - as always
 
Would it help weed out the homebrew ebikes by paying a LBS to inspect ebikes regularly (every 2 years?) and add legit ebikes {and banned homebrews} to a register with photo of ebike, with a QR sticker or code on the ebike, that rail staff could input on the register app?

That would help sort out the dodgy ones
and would provide a handy source of income for LBSs


But as always enforcement would be the problem
but if all bike had to go through a aspecific gate at railway station where the QR code could be checked it might help
assuming that the rail companies are happy to do the checking

actually it wouldn;t help here - because the stations are too small to do the checking - but it would help in bigger stations like city centres
 

mjr

Comfy armchair to one person & a plank to the next
Would it help weed out the homebrew ebikes by paying a LBS to inspect ebikes regularly (every 2 years?) and add legit ebikes {and banned homebrews} to a register with photo of ebike, with a QR sticker or code on the ebike, that rail staff could input on the register app?
It might help, but who pays, does there need to be only one app, it would need to be on some sort of anti-tamper label across the battery case seal, and there are still a lot of other potentially-a-bit-flamey batteries that should be addressed. Focusing on e-bikes or even e-scooters seems like dealing with only a fraction of the danger, especially when some e-scooters can be folded and put in a backpack and some e-unicycles look like suitcases.
 

wiggydiggy

Legendary Member
It would certainly help if the media (etc) would stop referring to transport devices with 2 wheels and an electric motor all in the same way - as ebikes

People on here will generally know that there are legal versions which could more properly referred to as Pedalecs or EPACs

and the ones that are not compliant with these regulation should be referred to as mopeds or motorbikes - the power source is not all that relevant
nor is it relevant that the motor and battery are nailed onto some sort of bicycle


It seems that some of the more responsible media are starting to use better words to describe them but the general public seems to think of them all the same
It will be a slow process to change the way people think - as always

Leeds-Live can't even spell the bikes name right (Cerrera not Carrera): Leeds e-bike rider in hospital with serious head injury after crash

And in this one they start by calling it an e-bike, then later decide its actually an electric motorbike: Paramedics rush e-bike rider to hospital after Leeds crash
 

classic33

Leg End Member
Leeds-Live can't even spell the bikes name right (Cerrera not Carrera): Leeds e-bike rider in hospital with serious head injury after crash

And in this one they start by calling it an e-bike, then later decide its actually an electric motorbike: Paramedics rush e-bike rider to hospital after Leeds crash
For the motorbike part it seems to be the quote from West Yorkshire Police being reported.
 
I tend to wonder if technically this attitude is completely correct.

AIUI the E-bike is derived from bike which is derived from bicycle. That is a two wheeled vehicle with pedals to provide drive. If the E-bike has pedals that work even if they have a motor or do not meet a legal requirement they are still bicycles. They can be used as a normal bicycle.

The distinction is whether it is legal or not. There are many requirements to be called a legal E-bike but that IMHO does not stop the basic premise that these are two wheeled personal transportation with pedals to drive it forwards.

It is not terminology that creates media hysteria but the media editorial position. Media often drives attitudes but also the way people use the technology. Put simply any driver that sits in traffic while they watch legal or illegal e-bike riders scoot along without delay in and among the traffic jam. That annoys and triggers many. Just like illegal e-bikes triggers legal e-bike users and normal bike users to complain about them. Perhaps they do not like the unregulated, illegal e-bike user pass them through traffic too?
 

Jenkins

Legendary Member
Location
Felixstowe
You do t need to be qualified to look for the compliance plate/decal. If it doesn't have one its not a legal EPAC, regardless of whether it otherwise comforms to the cut out limit, etc.

Regular, ie, non specialist, bobbies are taught to look for the compliance plate/decal without any specialist knowledge or training. All it takes is functioning eyes and an idea of what they look ljke and where theyre typically found. No qualifications required.

As has been pointed out before, the compliance stickers are easily available online for a few pounds.

Put a dodgy sticker on the 'bike' on the right photographed at London Bridge station just over half an hour ago and it would pass your test.
IMG_20250625_141720038_HDR~2.jpg
 

wiggydiggy

Legendary Member
For the motorbike part it seems to be the quote from West Yorkshire Police being reported.

At least Plod get it right then which leaves even less of an excuse for the newspaper to still call it an e-bike.

As has been pointed out before, the compliance stickers are easily available online for a few pounds.

Put a dodgy sticker on the 'bike' on the right photographed at London Bridge station just over half an hour ago and it would pass your test.
View attachment 777681

Reminds me of this:

View: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/LvzBVJWvvB0
 

raleighnut

Legendary Member
You do t need to be qualified to look for the compliance plate/decal. If it doesn't have one its not a legal EPAC, regardless of whether it otherwise comforms to the cut out limit, etc.

Regular, ie, non specialist, bobbies are taught to look for the compliance plate/decal without any specialist knowledge or training. All it takes is functioning eyes and an idea of what they look ljke and where theyre typically found. No qualifications required.
load of bollocks. I've converted Maz's bike and my trike 12 years ago neither has burst into flames or stopped working................BTW both were done before the regulations changed
 
Top Bottom