his intention wasn't to endanger. He just thought that he'd hold the cyclist up the way that he'd been held up. What he didn't think about was the risk to the cyclist in doing so.
I couldn't agree more.I think that's the problem with a lot of road rage incidents. I very much doubt that people set out to endanger someone else, they just want to give them a fright or vent their frustration. The problem is that it would only take a momentary misjudgement and someone gets seriously injured or killed.
Heck, how would he have felt if he had misjudged it, and the person who ended up injured was you?
Unless you're a driving instructor, there's absolutely no need to teach anyone "a lesson" on the road.
I think that's the problem with a lot of road rage incidents. I very much doubt that people set out to endanger someone else, they just want to give them a fright or vent their frustration. The problem is that it would only take a momentary misjudgement and someone gets seriously injured or killed.
Heck, how would he have felt if he had misjudged it, and the person who ended up injured was you?
Unless you're a driving instructor, there's absolutely no need to teach anyone "a lesson" on the road.
sorry - I've only seen it on the electrician's laptop. O might be able to help when he gets back from his ride.
Do we actually know the van driver was making a point by it? It looks more like a typical thoughtless bit of driving to me. Not good but not intentionally bad .
I think if it were me on the bike I would have been muttering under my breath about the pointless manouver but thats about it.
oh, yes, he's seen it. He told me about it. He used the van to make a point to a cyclist that annoyed him, and didn't appreciate that, irrespective of the 'befores' he wasn't in a position to know precisely what would happen when he turned left - not least because the road (and the cyclist's brakes) were wet.The point is that if you want to make a point, using £1500 kg of metal isn't the best way of doing it.