Chris Froome has the thinnest upper arms I've ever seen....I know these guys have to be kinda featherlight but you could snap his upper arms like a twig....awesome performance on Ventoux today...amazing
Arms are only a necessary evil. They are only required to stop your torso falling onto your handlebars. Any muscle or fat on them is completely unnecessary and weight you can you do without. .
The climbers tend to be (relatively speaking) smaller and lighter. Nairo Quintana's 5ft 3 and 126 lb. Froome's 6ft 1 and 152 lb. Whereas I'm a couple of inches shorter than Froome, a few pounds heavier than Quintana, and a lot less powerful than either
I am the same height as Froome and I was 2 kgs lighter than him when I finished university. At that time, my arms were so skinny that I could get a large-sized roll of Sellotape over a hand and push it all the way up to the armpit! These days, I can only get one two inches beyond the wrist.
Unfortunately, I didn't start cycling over the local hills until I had put on 35 kgs in weight!
Not only do the top riders have skinny arms, they also have very narrow shoulders, which must help with aerodynamics. There's definitely an ideal body type for different sports and different aspects of those sports.
That got me curious, so I took my thigh and upper arm measurements: 23" and 13", respectively. Well, I guess my centre of gravity is lower than it used to be . My main problem these days is finding work trousers that fit the thighs without being too loose at the waist.
Not that I'm seriously comparing myself to Froome, I'm just a guy perilously close to middle-age, trying to do as much cycling as possible, to stave off inevitable mortality .
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.