GDPR

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Levo-Lon

Guru
'Good companies' will have been preparing for this for the last two years (after all, this isn't something recent - it's been around since 2016), so I can't see why you think it will cost them a 'fortune in fines'.

As for this being 'Pathetic busy body nonsense', I would suggest that you perhaps don't fully understand what GDPR is actually about.

The reality is GDPR is about ensuring that 'personal data' is only processed with either:
  1. the specific consent of the person whose data it is; or
  2. in line with a 'legitimate interest' (which are mainly related to legal obligations and powers)
GDPR also updates data protection legislation, provides a consistent approach across the EU (and the UK when it leaves the EU) and bring it into the new digital age.

What GDPR does is firmly reset the relationship between individuals and organisations. It makes it clear that someone's personal data is theirs - organisations can no longer take the approach that you 'give' your data to them and that's it. Despite what some people might suggest, you cannot sign away your rights to your personal data under GDPR.

'Personal data' is defined as “any information relating to an identified or identifiable natural person”, whether it relates to their private, professional or public life. As a general rule, any information that could be used to identify an individual – either on its own or when combined with another piece of information* – is classified as personal data. This can include:
  • a name (including a username);
  • a photo;
  • an email address (including a work email address);
  • posts on social networking websites;
  • location data (e.g. IP addresses)
as well as the more specific and easily recognisable 'personal' stuff such as biometric or genetic data, medical records, banks records, criminal records, HR records etc.

The GDPR has also closed down some of the loopholes used by unscrupulous organisations (both big and small) to try and avoid meeting their data protection obligations (e.g. offshoring).

Given the whole Facebook and Cambridge Analytica issues in recent weeks, this could not have come at a more opportune time.



* This is a very important bit of the equation, as it means that pseudonymised data is also covered. Organisations won't be able to try to get around their obligations by (for example) changing a username.

its still a load of busy body waffle as your post just shows.
Strange that lots of business are spending loads to conform.

Average joe like me dont give a toss to be honest,its just more crap at work that most of us see as pointless.
But Thankyou anyway
 

Nibor

Bewildered
Location
Accrington
Do you know a good GDPR consultant?

Yes

Can you give me their email address?

No
 

Dan B

Disengaged member
The LA Times and Chicago Tribune (same parent owner) are currently unavailable in "most European companies" due to GDPR. Other US newspapers are still available so the issue seems to be confined to Tribune Media.
Makes you wonder what they're doing with your data that they find it easier to deny access to an entire continent than fix their practices...
 

Andrew_P

In between here and there
I had loads of updating our privacy emails didn't even read them, I never tick the newsletter, keep me updated boxes. I would say 60% of the retailers are still emailing.

My understanding was I had to opt in as opposed to opt out. Wished I hadn't deleted them.
 

swee'pea99

Squire
Have to say I've noticed a significant reduction in spammy-type stuff since the weekend. In fact I've received only one spam-type email this morning:

upload_2018-5-31_11-15-13.png


Kind of ironic I thought...(before reporting it as spam).
 

ColinJ

Puzzle game procrastinator!
I enter a lot of competitions***. There are always terms and conditions to wade through and opt-ins/opt-outs to select. Up until recently I have encountered all sorts of sneaky ways to get you to accept what the organisation wants. I have seen opt-ins pre-checked so I have to uncheck them to opt out. I have seen opt-outs unchecked that I have to check so as not to opt in. I have even seen a pre-checked opt-in followed by a pre-cleared opt-in FOR THE SAME option. That was clearly designed to catch people who routinely check/uncheck options without reading the blurb thoroughly first.

I have seen option text so convoluted that it was difficult to work out whether to check or uncheck the box to achieve an opt out.

As GDPR approached I have noticed things getting much simpler - "Please tick the check box if you would like to receive amazing offers from us", that kind of thing.

I think the old cookie consent legislation was annoying because most of the web doesn't work properly without the use of cookies (or similar technology) so you pretty much HAVE to accept them to get anywhere without lots of subsequent hassle. All it did was cause every website to pop up forms which I am sure that 99% of users do not read properly, asking for consent which is routinely given. Nothing was really achieved other than wasting time.

GDPR seems to be a much more important step forward.

PS I do NOT consent to getting 50-150 junk emails a day from the company behind the fake companies sending them. (The emails are all the same format so I know one organisation is to blame.) My Outlook email filter catches all of them but insists on putting them in the Junk email folder instead of deleting them. Unfortunately, I get about 1 false positive a day so I have to wade through the junk mails deleting them manually to avoid losing that false positive mail.




*** I got back into it after meeting @DCLane on one of my forum rides and him telling me that he had won several big prizes. I subsequently won some bike stuff and £2,000, so - thanks DCL! :okay:
 

Tin Pot

Guru
Top Bottom