Good work. However I feel bound to mention the small matter of copyright. Taking images off of the internet and republishing them is a breach of copyright unless permission is given. Manipulating them just adds to this.
I’m not saying I’m blameless nor that in many cases it isn’t harmless, but like a lot of low-level misdemeanours, where do you draw the line? Better to know the facts then make your decisions than to inadvertently end up in a lawsuit for grabbing the wrong image. I’ve had pictures ‘stolen’ and reused without my knowledge or permission - when I find out all I ask for is a credit.
have you had any luck getting that credit?
Years ago, some bloke from Hornby on the east coast was using one of my photos of Hornby Castle for his historic hornby blog, I politely asked him for a link to the website he'd taken the photo from, but he flat refused (tosser). I then asked him to remove the photo from his blog, but he flat refused (tosser). It was only when i pointed out that the photo of Hornby Castle was in fact the one in Lancashire and not on the east coast, and advised him to remove it before anyone noticed how crap a historian he was, did he remove it (monty: 1, tosser: 0)
Lancashire County Council were also using the same photo on their City, Coast & Countryside website and i asked them for a link to the website they'd taken it from. They refused. I asked them to take the photo down and eventually they did, but even that took a lot of emails.
With regards to image editing software... it's best to just stick with what you know. I've been using Fireworks for the best part of 20 years. Photoshop just isn't intuitive for me, but i guess if I'd started with Photoshop, Fireworks would look like a cheap toy in comparison. I have had a look at GIMP in the past, but it offered me nothing more than what i was used to.. so stuck with Fireworks.