GRX Chainset with 105 R7000

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Dogtrousers

Lefty tighty. Get it righty.
I'm bringing forward my plan to replace my 105 50/34 chainset with a GRX 46/30. I was going to wait until the current chainset was well and truly worn out but I've become impatient.

The bike has 105 R7000 (11s) mechanical at the moment. I'd like to keep as much of that stuff as possible. Mainly to make the job easier. I intend to replace the cassette and chain at the same time so I make a new start with all new stuff.

The rear mech shouldn't be an issue capacity wise as the capacity is the same (50-34=16=46-30)

The bike is a steel framed bike and the front mech is band-on so I should be able to slip it down a few mm for the new smaller rings.
I may replace the RS500 bottom bracket while I'm at it because they don't last forever and the current one isn't a spring chicken.

This random website says it's all compatible https://www.cyclabo.com/topics/au0vhheojb/#compatibility-between-grx-and-road-105

But the Man from Spa Cycles says "a 105 front mech won't have quite enough throw to reach for the chainset, which sits 1.5mm further out."

Following the advice of the Man from Spa Cycles would mean fitting a new GRX front mech. As I can only find braze-on FD-RX810 in braze-on this would mean buying a separate clamp too. This all increases the amount of faff a lot and the expense a bit, but tbh expense is not the main concern. I can afford a new mech if I need it. It's more the faff that concerns me.

So my conundrum is: Do I believe the Man from Spa Cycles and get a new front mech? Or do I ignore him, cross my fingers, just get the chainset, then end up kicking myself when it doesn't work, order a mech have to wait while the new mech arrives, then find that the clamp is the wrong size or something like that, with my bike having been put out of action in the meantime?

Also, what the Man from Spa Cycles says worries me. If the chainrings sit 1.5mm further out, will that bugger up the shifting at the rear. It's tempting to ignore him and believe the random website, because I prefer its version of the truth, but it's a bit worrying.

As an aside, I could probably get a similar sized non-Shimano square taper chainset and fit a corresponding cartridge BB but that doesn't actually have any advantage that I can see and introduces a whole slew of new "will it work" and "what size BB" questions so I rejected that option as having more risk and no benefit. Case closed.

Anticipating the fact that CC posters tend to ignore specific questions and simply reply "you don't want to do that": Yes, I've done the gear ratio sums. Yes I do want to do that. No I don't want to fit an 8-speed triple, get a new bike, replace the chainrings individually, have my knees replaced, take up macramé instead of cycling or anything else like that.
 
Last edited:

Paulus

Started young, and still going.
Location
Barnet,
I'm bringing forward my plan to replace my 105 50/34 chainset with a GRX 46/30. I was going to wait until the current chainset was well and truly worn out but I've become impatient.

The bike has 105 R7000 (11s) mechanical at the moment. I'd like to keep as much of that stuff as possible. Mainly to make the job easier. I intend to replace the cassette and chain at the same time so I make a new start with all new stuff.

The rear mech shouldn't be an issue capacity wise as the capacity is the same (50-34=16=46-30)

The bike is a steel framed bike and the front mech is band-on so I should be able to slip it down a few mm for the new smaller rings.
I may replace the RS500 bottom bracket while I'm at it because they don't last forever and the current one isn't a spring chicken.

This random website says it's all compatible https://www.cyclabo.com/topics/au0vhheojb/#compatibility-between-grx-and-road-105

But the Man from Spa Cycles says "a 105 front mech won't have quite enough throw to reach for the chainset, which sits 1.5mm further out."

Following the advice of the man from Spa would mean fitting a new GRX front mech. As I can only find braze-on FD-RX810 in braze-on this would mean buying a separate clamp too. This all increases the amount of faff a lot and the expense a bit, but tbh expense is not the main concern. I can afford a new mech if I need it. It's more the faff that concerns me.

So my conundrum is: Do I believe the Man from Spa Cycles and get a new front mech? Or do I ignore him, cross my fingers, just get the chainset, then end up kicking myself when it doesn't work, order a mech have to wait while the new mech arrives, then find that the clamp is the wrong size or something like that, with my bike having been put out of action in the meantime?

Also, what the Man from Spa Cycles says worries me. If the chainrings sit 1.5mm further out, will that bugger up the shifting at the rear. It's tempting to ignore him and believe the random website, because I prefer its version of the truth, but it's a bit worrying.

As an aside, I could probably get a similar sized non-Shimano square taper chainset and fit a corresponding cartridge BB but that doesn't actually have any advantage that I can see and introduces a whole slew of new "will it work" and "what size BB" questions so I rejected that option as having more risk and no benefit. Case closed.

Anticipating the fact that CC posters tend to ignore specific questions and simply reply "you don't want to do that": Yes, I've done the gear ratio sums. Yes I do want to do that. No I don't want to fit an 8-speed triple, get a new bike, replace the chainrings, have my knees replaced, take up macramé instead of cycling or anything else like that.

Just recently I have reduced the Chainrings. With just a little adjustment of the limit screws the shifting is fine.
So my advice is try it and see what happens first before buying any more new kit.
 

All uphill

Still rolling along
Location
Somerset
I looked at something similar a couple of years ago and was also told (not by Spa) that GRX sits a wee bit further out. Having said that 1.5 is not much.

In your shoes I'd do as @Paulus suggests and try it. I think it will be fine. If not you still have the option of going square taper BB.

The other option I can see is buying a crank set that has the same offset as the 105 one; I'm not sure if you've already got the GRX one.

Edit: A quick Google suggests that most GRX is 2.5mm further out than 105.
My suggestion of GRX with square taper is of course stupid. Sorry.
 
Last edited:

wafter

I like steel bikes and I cannot lie..
Location
Oxford
Having been well down this rabbithole yes, the chainline is further out on GRX and consistently quoted at 47mm. 105 values appear less reliable at (it seems) anything from 43.5 to 45.5mm; although the difference between the two is regularly quoted at 2.5mm.

Some sources suggest that the 105 FD will fit if the limit screws are tweaked enough so you could always try this first if you're not desperate to get the conversion done in one hit. You're correct that the GRX FDs are only available in braze-on fitment and that an adaptor is needed.

I think there are two variants of said band-on adaptor - one native to 34.9mm (M-suffix?) and one to 31.8mm(?) (S-suffix?) ; both coming with at least one set of placcy adaptors to suit the sizes beneath including one for skinnier steel tubes. I went with the larger one allow fitment to the 31.8mm tube on the bike with an adaptor since this is much less likely to damage the paint / tube.

I'd not worry about chainline differences affecting functionality - on the usual 135mm QR / 142mm TA standard the chainline of the cassette is 50mm anyway, so even with GRX's increase you're remaining inboard of the optimum position - presumably since maintaining narrower cranks "because aero" was more important to shimano than keeping an optimal chainline / not knackering people's feet, knees and hips..
 

diplodicus

Active Member
I have done this on my gravel bike. The chain rings are definitely further out and really struggled with shifting into the big ring.
I didn't know about the fact grx sits futher out so carried on trying to make the 105 mech work.

My eventual work around was to fit washers between the chain set arms and the chain rings. This moved the rings back in toward the bike and allows shifting with 105 to an acceptable level.

I am not sure if this is a hack or bodge? :laugh:
 

N0bodyOfTheGoat

Über Member
Location
Hampshire, UK
The only time I don't like having a 46T ring on my gravel ebike instead of the 50T on my road bike is on a select few wide, fairly straight descents on my local hills, where I have to stop pedalling a bit sooner and get a bit aero to let the mass of me and bike (~110Kg) take over to reach ~40mph.
 
OP
OP
Dogtrousers

Dogtrousers

Lefty tighty. Get it righty.
The only time I don't like having a 46T ring on my gravel ebike instead of the 50T on my road bike is on a select few wide, fairly straight descents on my local hills, where I have to stop pedalling a bit sooner and get a bit aero to let the mass of me and bike (~110Kg) take over to reach ~40mph.

Shouldn't affect me. For me downhills are free distance so I stop pedalling as soon as I'm sure I won't grind to a halt. I don't want to use up pedal revs that I might need later on. ;)

I'm on the brakes way before I get to those kinds of speed. Me and my bike do weigh about that though :smile:
 

StuAff

Silencing his legs regularly
Location
Portsmouth
Considering the same switch for the Tripster (currently full 105 R7000). Merlin have the GRX RX600 crankset for £57, FD from there or elsewhere about £27.
 

SpokeyDokey

69, & my GP says I will officially be old at 70!
Moderator
 
Top Bottom