[QUOTE 3079259, member: 45"]No, banging on about how powerful your cars are in Clarkson-speak.[/QUOTE]
So one can't make a comparison about 2 cars on performance v's noise v's task specific functionality... there's a word for that - stupidity
Mrs 3BM's got a VW Up with a 3-cylinder 60bhp engine, I think it's quite nippy.
Not at 1 mile up it's not, in fact it needs its engining revving hard to do most things once your over town speeds. It's a useful town car but then again if you seriously want a nippy car start looking a smaller electrics.
[QUOTE 3079507, member: 259"]Have you tried it on the ice?

[/QUOTE]
Not yet. Still would need to be revved though. There's no reason not to run high revs on snow & ice if you approach it correctly, i.e. very smoothly.
The VW has a zero tax rating so can be categorised as a bicycle or something, your Fiat probably produced the same amount of gunge as a Chinese power station. Anyway I just looked up the spec for the VW and it has a 0 - 60 of 14.4 seconds, so it's actually quicker than the 550 car mentioned earlier as that needs 5 ltrs to get to 60 in 5 seconds whereas the VW equivalent would be 0 - 60 in 2.88 seconds as it's a 1 litre, see.
Epic 'man maths' fail you've achieved there. If you dropped an extra tonne on an UP you'd be seeing something around 20-25s 0-60
EDIT: you'd need a 3.5-3.7l engine with the same specific output as the 60bhp UP to get to 60 in 5 seconds, assuming perfect traction off the line. The 550i is a 4.4l V8... which considering the car is double the weight, has about the same aero drag actually shows how efficent it is for such a big engine. Also the car is actually faster than BMWs figures, BMW figures seem to be based on having 35-50% load capacity