User76 said:Well thats wrong for a start. Are you saying that only 130 of every 650,000 people are cyclists? Rubbish, there are many more cyclists in each 650,000 of the population, but that an additional 130 get killed through some cycling related event. Therefore those 130 people have effectively doubled their chance of dying. So the headline is "Cyclists risk of death is doubled!"
You'd never catch me doing it![]()
Cyclists are reducing their risk of dying from other causes (heart attacks, for example, which are still Britain's biggest killer) more than they're increasing their risk of dying in a road accident. So cycling is less dangerous than not-cycling.
You'd never catch me not-cycling.