How to insult a nation in 6 words

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Crankarm

Guru
Location
Nr Cambridge
Weegie said:
Hehe. You're probably quite right - thanks for the alignment. I just don't like sensationalist journalism, and for whatever reason, this one really touched a nerve :ohmy:.

Which is not likely to give any reaction as they are all anaethetised up to their eyeballs on vodka :biggrin:. 46 bottles a year is nearly a bottle a week! Hardly time to sober up. Mind it's cold and wet up there for 360 days of the year and with politicians such as Alex Salmonface it's no wonder they don't drink more than this so they are permanently pickled :laugh:.
 

Crankarm

Guru
Location
Nr Cambridge
Weegie said:
Hehe. You're probably quite right - thanks for the alignment. I just don't like sensationalist journalism, and for whatever reason, this one really touched a nerve :biggrin:.

Which is not likely to give any reaction as they are all anaethetised up to their eyeballs on vodka :biggrin:. 46 bottles a year is nearly a bottle a week! Hardly time to sober up. Mind it's cold and wet up there for 360 days of the year and with politicians such as Alex Salmonface it's no wonder they don't drink more than this so they are permanently pickled :smile:.
 

montage

God Almighty
Location
Bethlehem
Coco said:
You'd drink 46 bottles of vodka if you had neighbours like us :biggrin:

We built hadrians wall, you complained :laugh:
 

scook94

Guru
Location
Stirling
Coco said:
You'd drink 46 bottles of vodka if you had neighbours like us :smile:

6.gif
 

rich p

ridiculous old lush
Location
Brighton
If that's an average and there's a lot who don't take up their quota then there must be quite a few who exceed that figure.
Why did they use vodka and not scotch?
 

rich p

ridiculous old lush
Location
Brighton
If that's an average and there's a lot who don't take up their quota then there must be quite a few who exceed that figure.
Why did they use vodka and not scotch?
 
telesonic99 said:
"England can not bat for toffee"
The way they batted today, the wicket might as well have been made of toffee...:smile:


But back to topic. A classic example of 'how to lie with statistics', I think, and reading the headline and the opening paragraph, I'm inclined to agree with the 'insult' claims. They could equally have conjured up a headline like "xx% of adults in Scotland drink the equivalent of more than yy bottles of Vodka..." ("...Whisky"?), whatever the values "xx" and "yy" turn out to be. That would have equally explained that there is a problem, but would have presented it in a far different light. Or they could even have gone all technical and stated the variance or sigma, but that would have lost most people who stop at the lies rather than the stats...
 
telesonic99 said:
"England can not bat for toffee"
The way they batted today, the wicket might as well have been made of toffee...:tongue:


But back to topic. A classic example of 'how to lie with statistics', I think, and reading the headline and the opening paragraph, I'm inclined to agree with the 'insult' claims. They could equally have conjured up a headline like "xx% of adults in Scotland drink the equivalent of more than yy bottles of Vodka..." ("...Whisky"?), whatever the values "xx" and "yy" turn out to be. That would have equally explained that there is a problem, but would have presented it in a far different light. Or they could even have gone all technical and stated the variance or sigma, but that would have lost most people who stop at the lies rather than the stats...
 
Top Bottom