I noticed in the news the different way the helicopter crash was dealt with:
This states that where material loss or damage is caused to any person or property on land, by an aircraft while in flight, the owners of that aircraft are strictly liable.
In essence, the Act directs that the aircraft owner shall be treated as having caused the crash and the victims are automatically entitled to compensation without having to prove anything
Quoted from the BBC news story on it this week.
Why can't some of that responsibility be taken by drivers (and cyclists).