Aperitif
Meme bar
- Location
- ...I don't have much idea - really.
Am I reading this right? Your assessment seems to be that - well, being as she was outside the cycle lane, she has to accept a close pass.
Are you sure?
Now, the cyclist does not give the cyclist on her inside anywhere near enough room. That's not good cycling.
But arguing that because the car is in a good position "in relation to the white lines" (!!), the overtake was alright, is frankly absurd.
The driver should be in a good position with respect to the human being on the bicycle - regardless of how poor her overtake on the other cyclist is (in fact I would say that's a reason for being even more cautious, to compensate).
(To anticipate a comeback argument - I don't think the driver can argue that she suddenly swerved into his lane to overtake. She appears in the vid at 0:18, pretty much on the white line. The car overtakes her six seconds later, and in that time her line has barely deviated - maybe a few more inches to her right. As stated previously, her positioning is poor, as is the overtake - but she is in the driver's vision for plenty of time, and her line does not deviate substantially enough to justify the proximity of the pass).
Yes - I'm sure. If you are going to overtake, (or 'barely deviate'

You talk about human being on a bicycle. There are also human beings in cars. Of course, the cyclist is vunerable, but that's what we acknowledge as cyclists, or should do - and behave accordingly.
Last night, while stopped at lights, I had a casual word with a cyclist on Finchley Road - one of London's race tracks...suggested that she might like to get a rear light as it was difficult to 'pick her up' on approach.
She lifted up her overcoat and there it was - flashing for its life to an audience of none.
