Hey all,
I am currently training for the london duathlon, and today went up to Richmond Park for a trial run of the first run and bike leg. My times were 46 minutes for the running (though im pretty sure i ran a kilometre or so further than the actual race distance, i started in the wrong place, so probably closer to 42 or 43 minutes), and then 42 minutes for two full laps of the park straight after (30km/h average speed approximately). I don't have anyone to compare this to so was wondering if anyone could tell me if this is good or still needs some work?? Bearing in mind I am a reasonably fit 19-year old, who took up cycling properly about 3 months ago.
Thanks in advance for any comments
I am currently training for the london duathlon, and today went up to Richmond Park for a trial run of the first run and bike leg. My times were 46 minutes for the running (though im pretty sure i ran a kilometre or so further than the actual race distance, i started in the wrong place, so probably closer to 42 or 43 minutes), and then 42 minutes for two full laps of the park straight after (30km/h average speed approximately). I don't have anyone to compare this to so was wondering if anyone could tell me if this is good or still needs some work?? Bearing in mind I am a reasonably fit 19-year old, who took up cycling properly about 3 months ago.
Thanks in advance for any comments