KM vs Miles

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Alex321

Guru
Location
South Wales
I don't recall ever being taught anything about weights at school so I don't have a clue about ounces (or fluid ounces come to that) and in real life I've never come across ounces except for rolling tobacco ("half an ounce of Old Holborn" something I haven't said for 30-odd years)
Sweets always used to be 4oz. Now 100g which is slightly less.

All recipes I do are metric. It's only Americans who don't use grams and ml. If I'm looking for a recipe online I just skip the ones with ounces and cups and fluid oz. and all that jazz.

Yes, I do prefer metric for recipes to.


Similarly it's only Americans who use pounds. Especially for weight of people (or even vehicles!). I can cope with stone and lb for the weight of people but apart from that pounds never really appears in everyday life unless there are Americans involved.

Most market stalls sell fruit & veg by the pound still IME.
 

Jenkins

Legendary Member
Location
Felixstowe
What about those of us that work in metric or imperial depending on the situation or have their own conversion methods?
For example...
People are weighed by stones & pounds, bikes (and almost everything else) are weighed by kg
Longer distances are measured in miles, shorter ones in metric. Easy conversions are that a metre is a yard and a bit while miles to km is to add 50 % and then 10% of the original mileage
500ml = a pint less the head of beer
 

Ming the Merciless

There is no mercy
Photo Winner
Location
Inside my skull
I grew up with a mix, as most people in the UK did, but all the illogical numbers just confused me, I dropped imperial measurements as soon as I came here: it's so much simpler with metric.

Neither is illogical just fundamentally different approaches.

The metric system, officially known as the International System of Units (SI), builds on powers of ten - elegant, mathematical, and predictable.

The imperial system, rooted in medieval England, draws from human-scale references: feet based on actual feet, inches from thumb widths, and yards from the distance of a stride, mile derived from the Roman "mille passus" (thousand paces)
 
Last edited:

Dogtrousers

Lefty tighty. Get it righty.
1788298377890.png
 

classic33

Leg End Member
Neither is illogical just fundamentally different approaches.

The metric system, officially known as the International System of Units (SI), builds on powers of ten - elegant, mathematical, and predictable.

The imperial system, rooted in medieval England, draws from human-scale references: feet based on actual feet, inches from thumb widths, and yards from the distance of a stride, mile derived from the Roman "mille passus" (thousand paces)
The two miles were/are different lengths, as were/are the measurements used to define the larger unit.
 

Punkawallah

Veteran
You missed "furlongs"
10 chains = 1 furlong
8 furlongs = 1 mile

Hard to fathom all the measurements

Some 1000 fathoms to the nautical mile, and about three Nautical miles to the League. :-)

It’s a question of usage. If you need to use them, you’ll know them.
 
Top Bottom