swansonj
Guru
On a managed motorway, the legality of driving on the hard shoulder depends entirely on the signage - whether or not the Red Cross is illuminated - nothing physical changes.
On a pavement, the legality of cycling on it depends entirely on the signage - whether the blue cycle path sign is present - (often) nothing physical changes.
Do those of you who advocate draconian penalties for driving on a hard shoulder (banning for life, shredding of tyres) also think that a simple fixed penalty is insufficient for cycling on pavements, and we should shred their tyres and ban them for life? Just curious....

On a pavement, the legality of cycling on it depends entirely on the signage - whether the blue cycle path sign is present - (often) nothing physical changes.
Do those of you who advocate draconian penalties for driving on a hard shoulder (banning for life, shredding of tyres) also think that a simple fixed penalty is insufficient for cycling on pavements, and we should shred their tyres and ban them for life? Just curious....
