No you're not. You are not 'subsiding' others - you're being asked to pay your fair share.
Or you could have got a prepayment certificate...
No it doesn't. And you clearly don't understand how public services are funded in the UK or how the taxes you pay are related to those services.
It does work out cheaper. I'm the one spending the money, after all, so I think I know how much I'm spending
Paying out more than is necessary to cover your own needs so that others can benefit is subsidising others. That's how the NHS works. People who don't need expensive medication end up paying for people who do.
I can live with that. What I have a problem with, however, is that the system is set up to be so grossly unfair. My mother-in-law was on disability, so she got free prescriptions. I was working, so I didn't. Her basic disability (not including the extra she received to pay someone to help her around the house) was more than I earned. How is that a fair system?
A prepayment certificate would have cost me even more. It was over £100 at the time - and even if it had benefitted me, how do you think people on low incomes find a random £100 here and there?
I understand perfectly how public services are funded in the UK. They're funded by various forms of tax, which are mostly assessed according to income. That works for me. The more you earn, the more you can afford to put in. However, prescription charges are not fairly assessed according to income.
We're always going to disagree on this because you are clearly one of the financial winners in the UK system and I was one of the losers, so I'm going to bow out of this thread before it degenerates into mud-slinging. I've made my points, you've made yours, and we'll just go round in circles if we carry on.