Nigeyy
Legendary Member
- Location
- Massachusetts, USA
Two things to take from the US sign:
1. it may well be useful in Cambridge, or the UK as culturally it is different from the USA.
2. I can tell you that living and cycling in the USA I would be very surprized if that sign is even remotely useful. Or observed. Or considered.
I certainly wouldn't recommend the US take on cycling (while it's not great, it's not the worst either in all fairness). And while I agree the Dutch system isn't perfect, it's the best I've experienced as well. However, it's all fine and dandy but someone has to pay for all the cycle friendly stuff -and there has to be the political motivation and will to do so. The photo of the roundabout is great, but that is a very expensive option too. Selling this idea and getting the political motivation and will to do something like that is the really hard part.
1. it may well be useful in Cambridge, or the UK as culturally it is different from the USA.
2. I can tell you that living and cycling in the USA I would be very surprized if that sign is even remotely useful. Or observed. Or considered.
I certainly wouldn't recommend the US take on cycling (while it's not great, it's not the worst either in all fairness). And while I agree the Dutch system isn't perfect, it's the best I've experienced as well. However, it's all fine and dandy but someone has to pay for all the cycle friendly stuff -and there has to be the political motivation and will to do so. The photo of the roundabout is great, but that is a very expensive option too. Selling this idea and getting the political motivation and will to do something like that is the really hard part.
Certainly putting signs like that up around Cambridge would be damn useful.
There is a lot about cycling that's bad in the US. So that mean all signs etc. used aren't useful?