jnb
Veteran
- Location
- In a corner
Davidc said:
Or the suspiciously easy to explain death of Diana?
Moon landing deniers.
- Thread starter Globalti
- Start date
Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
Or the suspiciously easy to explain death of Diana?
Hilldodger
Guru
- Location
- sunny Leicester
I don't even believe the moon is real. It's all done with mirrors I tell you.
Fnaar
Smutmaster General
- Location
- Thumberland
Marilyn Monroe was behind both Kennedy and Diana's deaths, the strings being pulled by her evil puppetmaster, Timmy Mallet. And the guy who runs our local Chinese takeaway.
Davidc
Guru
- Location
- Somerset UK
I always thought the two were connected. How does global warming fit in?
Fnaar
Smutmaster General
- Location
- Thumberland
Davidc said:
It's all down to the heat given off by Di's radiance.
Can I come down off the Grassy Knoll now? Getting tired of crouching behind the picket fence all these years...
Personally I just love all this Conspiracy Theory stuff! Just goes to show, diversity of people's opinions and beliefs is still alive and strong. Long live the Flat-Earthers!
To me the most telling evidence that the Moon landings were genuine, derives from the celebrated movie Capricorn One. Perhaps someone else can explain why I say that?
Personally I just love all this Conspiracy Theory stuff! Just goes to show, diversity of people's opinions and beliefs is still alive and strong. Long live the Flat-Earthers!
To me the most telling evidence that the Moon landings were genuine, derives from the celebrated movie Capricorn One. Perhaps someone else can explain why I say that?
Mac66
Senior Member
- Location
- Newbury-ish
Ok here goes
1. Shadows of astronauts and other objects not completely parallel, suggesting more than 1 light source - No. Terrain affects how shadows fall, uphill diverges shadows, down hill converges shadows IIRC.
2. Areas not illuminated by sun should be totally dark so why do photos show detail on non-illuminated sides? Well duh, light shines off the moon's surface, back onto objects, so pretty uniform illumination
3. The Flag moves but there is no wind on the moon. Flag was mounted on a flexible two part aluminium pole. The movement of the flag is a result of normal springiness/flexing in the poles as the flag is assembeled.
4. There is more computing power in a mobile phone than an Apollo spacecraft. True. However, most of the computing tasks were done back at mainframes at NASA and result sets sent to astronauts. Also landing etc is about number crunching and even the most basic computers are very good at this and doing it rapidly.
5. Radiation would have killed the astronauts. Well they did get dosed but their exposure time was not long enough
6. Mmmm. Tens of thousands of people including Americas enemies are keeping this hoax a secret. Yes of course they are...
7. No stars show in any pictures. Both the naked eye and cameras cannot see the stars due to the amount of light shining off the moons surface
7. One of the main sceptics is an ex-rocket engineer. He lives on his own in a mobile home in the desert running a cat sanctuary.
8. Labs around the world confirm that the moon is not made of cheese.
I think that point 7 convinces me that the landings were real
1. Shadows of astronauts and other objects not completely parallel, suggesting more than 1 light source - No. Terrain affects how shadows fall, uphill diverges shadows, down hill converges shadows IIRC.
2. Areas not illuminated by sun should be totally dark so why do photos show detail on non-illuminated sides? Well duh, light shines off the moon's surface, back onto objects, so pretty uniform illumination
3. The Flag moves but there is no wind on the moon. Flag was mounted on a flexible two part aluminium pole. The movement of the flag is a result of normal springiness/flexing in the poles as the flag is assembeled.
4. There is more computing power in a mobile phone than an Apollo spacecraft. True. However, most of the computing tasks were done back at mainframes at NASA and result sets sent to astronauts. Also landing etc is about number crunching and even the most basic computers are very good at this and doing it rapidly.
5. Radiation would have killed the astronauts. Well they did get dosed but their exposure time was not long enough
6. Mmmm. Tens of thousands of people including Americas enemies are keeping this hoax a secret. Yes of course they are...
7. No stars show in any pictures. Both the naked eye and cameras cannot see the stars due to the amount of light shining off the moons surface
7. One of the main sceptics is an ex-rocket engineer. He lives on his own in a mobile home in the desert running a cat sanctuary.
8. Labs around the world confirm that the moon is not made of cheese.
I think that point 7 convinces me that the landings were real
stoatsngroats
Legendary Member
- Location
- South East
Mac66 said:
Great - now, some say that the earth is ROUND.......can you 'explain' this...?
Davidc
Guru
- Location
- Somerset UK
stoatsngroats said:Great - now, some say that the earth is ROUND.......can you 'explain' this...?
The ancient Greeks definitely, several other ancient civilisations probably.
Haven't we moved on since then?
ComedyPilot
Secret Lemonade Drinker
- Location
- The Kingdom of Yorkshire
I don't know if it did or didn't happen. 
But I love saying it did to the conspiracy mob, and saying it didn't to anyone American.
But I love saying it did to the conspiracy mob, and saying it didn't to anyone American.
gaz
Cycle Camera TV
- Location
- South Croydon
There is only a few pieces of proof that they went to the moon, and thats the flag, the rover, and the landing cradle that are still on the moon.
Their is no camera that is currently strong enough either on the earth or in space use that can take a photo in that much detail.
until i see some photos i got no proof to say they have.
Their is no camera that is currently strong enough either on the earth or in space use that can take a photo in that much detail.
until i see some photos i got no proof to say they have.
Piemaster
Guru
- Location
- UK City of Culture
stoatsngroats said:Great - now, some say that the earth is ROUND.......can you 'explain' this...?
It isn't round. It's an oblate spheroid
