It's not Nokia. A start up has licensed the name.
Isn't it a partnership between Nokia and HMD Global?
The revamped version will be sold under licence by the Finnish start-up HMD Global, which also unveiled several Nokia-branded Android smartphones.
Back when I was working in mobile telco (about 2003 so not long after the introduction of 3G) the networks where I was would boot you off 3G down to 2G if you were only using voice, in order to keep the 3G network free for data. It resulted in the production of Handover Event Modules, which were the bane of my life at the time.That seems a bit odd because I thought 2G used much less power - and isn't that a good thing? It still bugs me that I must flip down the drawer from the top of the screen and tap the 2G/3G switcher manually before using data or making a short call and off again after, else the phone uses up its charge much quicker (it'll go 3 days on standby on 2G, less than 2 on 3G). Why isn't smart network selection a basic option on phone operating systems yet?
Didn't the mobile networks grumble about how the London Olympics Road Races should have used 2G for the on-course tracking too, or am I misremembering that? That said, it did seem a complete misjudgement of the capacity needed as phone networks crumbled as the spectators tried to use them - I took a radio to Richmond Park and had quite the crowd around me, even though the BBC were working out the time gaps by things like standing on a table near the top of Box Hill with a stopwatch, thanks to the aforementioned tracking collapse.
Strangely enough, they didn't consult me.That seems a bit odd because I thought 2G used much less power - and isn't that a good thing?
Missing a not there? But it looks like externalisation to me: cheaper infrastructure for the networks, more recharging costs for the phone users.Strangely enough, they didn't consult me.
I imagine running duplicate infrastructure with a population density 1/100th of the UK just was economical.
Probably because they are "throwaway" when no longer required, after all you could turn off GPS and mobile data on a smartphone and essentially have a smashable Nokia 3310.According to all the "Police Reality" series, only drug dealers and criminals use these phones as they are more secure and less traceable
Well, that sent me down a tiny rabbit hole. Turns out Australia has about 30 million phones, and the 2G network is only used for 1% of the traffic, so call that 300,000 phones. Apparently it costs about $.50 to charge an iPhone for a year. So that's a total cost to consumers of well below $A150,000. I've got to assume maintaining an network over 7.5 million square km costs more than that.Missing a not there? But it looks like externalisation to me: cheaper infrastructure for the networks, more recharging costs for the phone users.
So this is saving you about 1 pence per month. Wouldn't it be less bother to recharge it every second day?It still bugs me that I must flip down the drawer from the top of the screen and tap the 2G/3G switcher manually before using data or making a short call and off again after, else the phone uses up its charge much quicker
That is a good point. My Galaxy S7 when put on airplane mode (and not fiddled with during the day) was at 34% when I woke up, and was still on 20 something% when I went to bed. The battery life isn't the issue - it's the battery hungry users! And if you have any basic phone that you only use for the odd call, it's going to last ages.Of course an unusable phone will have a very long battery life.
Apologies for sending you to visit teh bunnies, but that doesn't surprise me: they've still got to maintain a network over 7.5 million square km, but presumably it saves them something not to operate the 2G bands and protocols, maybe including not paying for the licences....So that's a total cost to consumers of well below $A150,000. I've got to assume maintaining an network over 7.5 million square km costs more than that.
But rabbit hole revealed they are shutting it down so they can reuse the frequencies, not save costs.
Not really: it's a bother having it tethered to a charging point or on a charging mat. Plus you missed battery replacement cost from the limited number of recharges but I assume that's not particularly significant with a good battery manager.So this is saving you about 1 pence per month. Wouldn't it be less bother to recharge it every second day?
17 year old handset, everyday use during that time. Now on the third battery. Standby time of two weeks.Plus you missed battery replacement cost from the limited number of recharges but I assume that's not particularly significant with a good battery manager.
That is a good point. My Galaxy S7 when put on airplane mode (and not fiddled with during the day) was at 34% when I woke up, and was still on 20 something% when I went to bed. The battery life isn't the issue - it's the battery hungry users! And if you have any basic phone that you only use for the odd call, it's going to last ages.