lady_rider
New Member
- Location
- Norf Yorkshire
It's 'start a new thread' day today, so why not one which is a bit politically incorrect?
The main problem of the majority of the world's environmnental problems is usually ignored... namely, too many people. So how do you get rid of some in a way that is both ethical and useful for future generations?
In nature, it's 'survival of the fittest'. Humans have become a bit molly-coddled and it's no longer survival of the fittest generally, but survival of the richest. Those who can afford the basic necessities of life, and expensive treatment when ill.
My theory is that everyone should have to spend 2 weeks a year entirely in the wild, without provisions. Those who survive, obviously get to live. Those who don't, obviously don't. That takes care of the physical fitness side (I guess it could be argued that fatties would survive because of excess resources, but they'd also slim down and be less of a burden). People who are infirm, but survive because others helped them to, enable the generation of a society built on altruism which is no bad thing. Whatch'a reckon?
(I have been termed a 'fascist hippy' before, just for the record).
Any other theories going?

The main problem of the majority of the world's environmnental problems is usually ignored... namely, too many people. So how do you get rid of some in a way that is both ethical and useful for future generations?
In nature, it's 'survival of the fittest'. Humans have become a bit molly-coddled and it's no longer survival of the fittest generally, but survival of the richest. Those who can afford the basic necessities of life, and expensive treatment when ill.
My theory is that everyone should have to spend 2 weeks a year entirely in the wild, without provisions. Those who survive, obviously get to live. Those who don't, obviously don't. That takes care of the physical fitness side (I guess it could be argued that fatties would survive because of excess resources, but they'd also slim down and be less of a burden). People who are infirm, but survive because others helped them to, enable the generation of a society built on altruism which is no bad thing. Whatch'a reckon?

Any other theories going?