I've shown no disrespect, I don't think - and anyway you're probably right.ComedyPilot said:Yes, it may be that it was something somone said that triggered the divulgence of information, but that wasn't how it read in the OP.
On the 'friend' front, we only have her word (as regaled by Maggot) that this friend even exist/s/ed.
I also stand firm with my thoughts on a woman that can enter an office at 08:30, and by 09:08 WE know about her dis-satisfaction at the transfer, her solo (selfish) coffee trips, her health, her dislike of jaffa cakes, her urge to have the biscuit club re-arranged and not to forget her 'friend' and their (still alleged) passing.
I am sure I am wrong, but how unproffesional is it to get all that out in under 38minutes - when you are meant to be working?
Just my view.
Please respect it, as I do yours.
If you don't want a hug, then all the more for Arch.![]()
But if not, indeed if this whole thread has got it grievously wrong - well let's hope this poor creature doesn't get to read it! On someone else's computer in the office that just happens to have CycleChat open on it (when it ought to be used for work only) possibly? Maggot??! Maggot???
