It was only at interview that I started to question what exactly I was trying to prove. I was well aware that fantastic candidates are often turned down, and I did not believe that this was a true reflection of their academic potential. It no longer made any sense to me to subject myself to their judgment, and so I withdrew my application.
I respect that. I really do. I think we've all had similar experiences; realised things about ourselves, what we're trying to achieve, who we're talking to, etc etc etc.... all later in the day. From job interview to buying an expensive item, you go through this 'what on earth am I trying to achieve here?' moment.
But why, having done that, make a public issue over it? Why not simply politely withdraw? Sure, the letter (in isolation) is amusing, in a 'turn the tables' kind of a way. Many of us have the urge to do something like that (particularly if we're about to be rejected
get the boot in first as it were!), so it strikes a chord.
I've no idea what made her write that letter in the manner that she did, less idea of how the story got to the papers, but I do see the action as maybe self-serving.... and one she may come to regret.
