Pannier or Rucksack?

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Cedric

New Member
I realise this might be nitpicking, but what's best in terms of cycling ease (not convenience)? I ride to work with one side mounted pannier on a rack. I sometimes ride without the pannier and am surprised that there is a noticeable difference. Other than the additional weight, I'm thinking that the pannier is not very aerodynamic and creates a lot of drag. I also suppose that you are adding weight to the area of your bike that already has the greatest load; the rear mech; cassette and yourself. I'm thinking about going back to a rucksack. I think that the rucksack nestled behind my back will be more streamlined, the weight will be a "mobile" weight moving with my body and not a "dead" weight, and that I will be able to put the extra weight into my peddle stroke. Is this a load of bollocks?
 
I have both,that's probably why im slow.
 

gary r

Guru
Location
Camberley
i find a pannier much better,I hate the sweaty back you get wearing a rucksack! also the rucksack obscures any reflective material you might have on your top.My ruck sacks also used to end up soaking wet from sweat & not very sweet smelling after a while!!!!
 
Location
Rammy
i use either depending on what i'm taking and what i'm doing

i think i'm faster with the pannier as i am not as restricted in leaning forward for the bars.
 

Ivan Ardon

Well-Known Member
Changing from a rucksack to a pannier has made my commuter into a far more useful machine.
 

skwerl

New Member
Location
London
Cedric said:
What advantage does a messenger bag have over a rucksack then?
less restrictive. you don't have the straps in the way of your arms.
people say they have a smaller contact patch than a rucksack too so the swear issue is reduced. i don't know as I swapped from an Deuter Air Race to messenger bag. The air race was less sweaty
 

HJ

Cycling in Scotland
Location
Auld Reekie
Cedric said:
I realise this might be nitpicking, but what's best in terms of cycling ease (not convenience)? I ride to work with one side mounted pannier on a rack. I sometimes ride without the pannier and am surprised that there is a noticeable difference. Other than the additional weight, I'm thinking that the pannier is not very aerodynamic and creates a lot of drag. I also suppose that you are adding weight to the area of your bike that already has the greatest load; the rear mech; cassette and yourself. I'm thinking about going back to a rucksack. I think that the rucksack nestled behind my back will be more streamlined, the weight will be a "mobile" weight moving with my body and not a "dead" weight, and that I will be able to put the extra weight into my peddle stroke. Is this a load of bollocks?

Probably... :biggrin:
 

Plax

Guru
Location
Wales
I started off with a rucksack and then moved onto panniers. Definitely prefer the panniers. No disernable difference in performance of the bike with panniers and it feels more liberating. I found I got a sweaty back, sometimes a pain in the shoulders and it made me over heat quicker when I had a rucksack (a proper hiking one).

Now I tend to just use a carradice saddle bag (the Barley) which I can squeeze in a change of clothes, toiletries and lunch in. I'll only use panniers now if I'm taking my shower stuff & towel to or from work or if I know I've got to carry something that won't fit in the saddle bag. I have the SQR system which is fab as I can swap the saddle bag between bikes (my hybrid hasn't got any braze ons for a rack).
 
Top Bottom