PhD

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

martint235

Dog on a bike
Location
Welling
I'm curious. I hold a BSc and there was pressure at the time to do MSc and PhD. In computing, the idea was that to achieve PhD you had to come up with an original idea. Is this still the criteria and does it (original idea) apply across disciplines?
 

Noodley

Guest
When I completed my Masters degree in social work there was some discussion about me carrying forward the "original" idea from my dissertation into a PhD. So, possibly "original ideas" are encouraged across disciplines - I got a job instead.
 

vernon

Harder than Ronnie Pickering
Location
Meanwood, Leeds
When I started a PhD, since abandoned, I was told that I had to nudge the boundaries of knowledge further out. It wasn't so much having a new idea but looking at something that had been ignored/neglected. I has a pi55 poor supervisor and quit after a couple of years and a few confrontations.
 

marinyork

Resting in suspended Animation
Location
Logopolis
Google Bologna process. It's not just about that (obviously), but there's a heck of a lot of stuff in there about these sorts of things and how it relates or how it is supposed to relate to other postgraduate qualifications in various countries (and a few pointers about how stuff is done differently).

As for computer science - huge amounts out at the frontiers. So, so, so vast.
 
When I started a PhD, since abandoned, I was told that I had to nudge the boundaries of knowledge further out. It wasn't so much having a new idea but looking at something that had been ignored/neglected. I has a pi55 poor supervisor and quit after a couple of years and a few confrontations.
same here - but no-one ever warned me about the reprecussions of dropping out of an organic chemistry PhD.

when my credit card details were found on a dodgy website, rather than see the 'victim' (details had been hacked from another site), the police saw an organic chemistry PhD drop-out who lived with no neighboors and a large amount of woodland on the edge of an MOD training area and for some reason jumped to the conclusion that raiding the place was the best move. Had they considered this matter more carefully, they could have actually done what every other dog walker did and claim to have lost their dog in the woodland (lots of rabbits, deer and pheasants) and either enter without permission or if they saw me, ask if I had seen said dog and ask if they could enter the unfenced woodland to find it. Instead, whilst standing (think skimy top & shorts & wellies or consider my avatar) in the veg plot havesting courgettes with a seriously sharp & large outdoor knife in my hand, I heard lots of vehicles coming up the track and a few minutes later armed police pouring out of vehicles... seemed rather excessive from my view to let me know my credit card details had been compromised.
 

thom

____
Location
The Borough
You can say that. You can also say a PhD is like a training qualification for the purposes of doing further independent research. To a first approximation these are probably the same. Thing is, between countries, universities, subjects, there are many differences in the academic culture that qualify what is reasonable to expect from a student in the training process and how a new idea might manifest itself.

My impression in Math was that there was quite a wide variation in the standard of thesis that would be accepted for the PhD qualification. I think there has been a policy for universities to be producing more PhD students that subsequently go and work in the wider economy. That means the university will ultimately set lower standards if the thesis is not to be the basis for an academic career.

The original PhD qualification was a German one I think, with the intention on training individuals for research. German PhDs to this day are frequently completed by people in their early 30s. US PhDs also structurally seem to be set up to take about 5 years.
In the UK, Oxford and Cambridge's notion of a degree was a 2 stage 3 year taught study process (there must have been plenty of room for various elements of self study too), awarding BAs after 3 years and MAs after 3 more that I think were about developing character too. People could drop out after 3 years but I don't think that was the intention when you started. After this, if you were impressive enough you could just start and become part of some academic institution I suppose. On an historical digression, now that the BA is the standard copied University qualification, Oxford and Cambridge retain and practice the right to award MAs (Oxon/Cantab) to BA students 3 years after graduation, without requiring further study (although being sent to prison or getting divorced used to disqualify you).

In summary, my impression is the "new idea" rule of thumb is slightly less applicable than in the past but as with primary and secondary school education standards, things change expediently.

Edit: experimentalists would be looking for results in any case:
phd022106s.gif
 

thom

____
Location
The Borough
It's Maths.
Dude, I've got the qualification, I can call it what I like :tongue:
 

Wobblers

Euthermic
Location
Minkowski Space
It depends on the discipline.

In the arts, you'll most likely be expected to produce an original idea along with a proposal on how you intend to explore that idea as part of the application process. In the sciences, it's far more likely that your supervisor will already have a project in mind which you're expected to make an original contribution to.

In both cases, the pass criteria is that you must have made a original and novel contribution to knowledge.
 

srw

It's a bit more complicated than that...
I have lost nothing in later life by failing my DPhil. And I do actually mean 'failing'. It was judged that I hadn't successfully made an original contribution to knowledge - probably because I didn't prove my theorem. I haven't been in touch with the subject since to find out if anyone else did.

Success seems to be down to having good, active, supportive supervision, an enormously dogged persistence and capacity for continuous hard work without results, and a tolerance for stultifyingly large amounts of serious tedium. None of which I had.

It's an odd system that gets people to specialise on minutiae and then expects them both to be highly creative and to inspire and mould immature minds.
 
U

User169

Guest
In the sciences, it seemed to me that more and more PhD students were being used to carry out work that previously would have been carried out by technicians. I suppose PhD students are cheaper to emply.
 
Top Bottom