Thinking about some of the threads over the last few weeks/months/years here in commuting, I had a thought this morning (always very dangerous!).
We often hear of the varying responses that cyclists get when approaching the police to report incidents on the road. In some instances the police take the incidents seriously, in others they can be very dismissive. So how can we do something about this? How can we be sure that there is a consistent and acceptable approach to cyclist reported road traffic incidents?
What would happen if each force area was required to have x number of Cycle Liason Officers (CLA)? I not talking about extra jobs, or even police officers that all cyclists direct their complaints to. These officers would provide an overseeing role in any incidents reported to the police, i.e. cyclist reports an incident to police officer A. Police officer A collects the info compiles a report and decided on a course of action. The CLA, having been nationally trained to deal with such situations and having specific understanding of the issues that cyclists face, does a quick check of the way that police officer A has dealt with the incident, and if necessary corrects and issues that he feels have arisen.
Why have the CLA? We all know that those who have not ridden a bike on the roads can be ignorant of the issues we face. This I am sure includes police officers. The CLA would provide police office A with the cycling background knowledge (balanced of course) that would help police officer A deal with the incident in a fairer way.
I am fully aware that I am naive about the workings of the police, but I thought I'd air my musings, if only to start a debate.
What do you think (especially the police officers among us)?
We often hear of the varying responses that cyclists get when approaching the police to report incidents on the road. In some instances the police take the incidents seriously, in others they can be very dismissive. So how can we do something about this? How can we be sure that there is a consistent and acceptable approach to cyclist reported road traffic incidents?
What would happen if each force area was required to have x number of Cycle Liason Officers (CLA)? I not talking about extra jobs, or even police officers that all cyclists direct their complaints to. These officers would provide an overseeing role in any incidents reported to the police, i.e. cyclist reports an incident to police officer A. Police officer A collects the info compiles a report and decided on a course of action. The CLA, having been nationally trained to deal with such situations and having specific understanding of the issues that cyclists face, does a quick check of the way that police officer A has dealt with the incident, and if necessary corrects and issues that he feels have arisen.
Why have the CLA? We all know that those who have not ridden a bike on the roads can be ignorant of the issues we face. This I am sure includes police officers. The CLA would provide police office A with the cycling background knowledge (balanced of course) that would help police officer A deal with the incident in a fairer way.
I am fully aware that I am naive about the workings of the police, but I thought I'd air my musings, if only to start a debate.
What do you think (especially the police officers among us)?