Do you mean they shouldn't be know as that because they are used for racing?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/2230459.stm
I used to own a similar bike, in fact, here I am with it
![]()
I also used that bike for daily commuting 50 miles each way, down the motorway. I never broke the speed limits on it, nor did I use its performance inappropriately on the road. As I understand the risks of that attitude on a public road and the dangers. I enjoyed it's performance on the track. I couldn't afford 2 bikes at the time. These days I am fortunate enough to be able to afford multiple forms of transport and motorcycles are rarely used on the road.
I have grown up with motorsport and racing. I have raced (before smashing my arm to pieces), but that does not mean that I am irresponsible on the road. You could say I have "bought into the culture", but that does not correlate directly into being a dangerous road user.
You keep bringing it back to you but it is about drivers in general. In general drivers speeding is a big problem for many, causes accidents and death and is part of a speed culture on our roads. Not everyone buys into it but very many drivers do.
But when you start to outright ban and legislatevly (spelling?) performance vehicles, it is responsible enthusiasts, of which there are a few on here. Who are the ones "punished". The prats in performance vehicles, will still go on to be a danger to others just in slightly slower cars.
Very true. But you are then in to "gun lobby" territory in punishing all legitimate and careful gun users for the antics of a few nutters.
Society in the UK is quite happy to stop a million people owning a gun if it stops one nut case getting hold of a gun and blowing a room full of kids away. Society in the US seems to opt to let the million have a gun each and accept the odd massacre.
You have to jump one way or the other - you seem to have jumped to the side accepting the massacre.
I agree the prats will still be there but over time the culture of cars would change and their outlook would change.
It's probably breaking forum rules aplenty, but I'm selling this if anyone's interested....It's a knob throbber.
I'd love a Porsche,I'd sell it and buy a bike and I could have my porch done up.
It's probably breaking forum rules aplenty, but I'm selling this if anyone's interested....
http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/201508146062599
I'm very flexible on price as it's been up a while. It's lovely, but I want to spend my cash on other things, one of which is a new vanity bike. I'm almost certainly a nobber.
It's probably breaking forum rules aplenty, but I'm selling this if anyone's interested....
http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/201508146062599
I'm very flexible on price as it's been up a while. It's lovely, but I want to spend my cash on other things, one of which is a new vanity bike. I'm almost certainly a nobber.
Only of boredom, Phil, only of boredom.How many people have you killed in it before buying?
Not as bad as you'd think. A long drive with a light touch on the loud pedal and you can easily hit the low 30s for mpg. It's the base Cayman, not a 911 turbo! My 1.2 Petrol qashqai will just about scrape 40+ for similar journeys.I couldn't afford the petrol,mate.
S'alright. But for that money I could get something nice.It's probably breaking forum rules aplenty, but I'm selling this if anyone's interested....
http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/201508146062599
I'm very flexible on price as it's been up a while. It's lovely, but I want to spend my cash on other things, one of which is a new vanity bike. I'm almost certainly a nobber.
There is no place in our society for super light carbon racing bikes, with skinny tyres that can do 60mph down a steep mountain road with just a crash helmet for protection.![]()