figbat
Slippery scientist
- Location
- South Oxfordshire, UK
None of this guff goes on with military equipment or aircraft that use oil, the industry accreditation applies absolutely.
My experience with military applications is somewhat dated, but back when I was involved in products for military diesel and turbine use, the military specifications were some of the most drawn-out, gilt-edged demands ever! They certainly weren't simply industry demands. I can believe that they may have taken a reality pill and eased off to enable efficiency and availability.
In defense of the OEMs (a little), the oil is now a significant part of the overall efficiency and emissions capability, so they are becoming increasingly application-specific. This is proliferating the spec demands leading to complicated product ranges with restricted use. Many recent OEM requirements are not backward-compatible for older engines, which is a big departure from previous spec updates that were generally OK to use in older engines. They are all heading for 0W-20/0W-16/0W-12 with low HTHS, which enables reduced fuel consumption but doesn't fare well in engines designed for and expecting thicker oils. For example VW have a dye and a chemical marker in their new(ish) 508 00/509 00 oil specification to both help avoid misapplication (green oil should only go in new engines) but also to detect misapplication should it become important.
I could go all day on this topic. I work for one of the well-known oil companies and have done for my whole career, currently closing in on 28 years. The vast majority of that time has been in the R&D function - I have worked on everything from motorcycles to ships.