Rangers Liquidation

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
mr messy

mr messy

Veteran
Location
Sunny? Glasgow, the friendly city...
Eddy said:
I think the use of EBTs are wrong myself but has already been ruled on that they were legal ( they didn't legally have to pay the tax) , your simplifying it though , not as straight forward as spending too much , the debt when Craig Whyte bought the company was manageable but the company had no credit line because of the threat of EBTs , so really it was the combination of the threat of a big tax bill which never materialised and the bank getting paid back and no further credit line that did them .
IMO Craig Whyte was brought in to liquidate Rangers .
Click to expand...
I don't think there is any doubt that was the "business" plan.
There is still more to come out of Ibrox and the current lot of "businessmen" in charge are probably up to their necks in it too!
 
U

User6179

Guest
Marmion said:
No Surrender to the SFA!
Click to expand...

First funny thing you have said on this thread
 
U

User6179

Guest
mr messy said:
I don't think there is any doubt that was the "business" plan.
There is still more to come out of Ibrox and the current lot of "businessmen" in charge are probably up to their necks in it too!
Click to expand...

Had someone tell me the other week that he thought Whyte was just unlucky :wacko:
Aye a few business men will be bricking it , I do not think Whyte will spill his guts though going by his recent interview , he is sticking to his story .
 
U

User6179

Guest
mr messy said:
Whyte has a history....and it's not one of naivety! There are still names to be named.......
Click to expand...

My theory is Whyte was brought in by the bank who got 18 million of the 22 million they were owed back , this seems very odd unless they knew Whyte was coming in to liquidate Rangers , would Whyte not try to pay less for the 22 million or even just pay off say 5 million of debt , why pay 18 million when the bank know they will be lucky to get a million if Rangers go into administration .
 
U

User6179

Guest
Aperitif said:
Its...not, no, it can't be... Lionel Messy? Or am I just being an ass...
Carry on chaps, Scotch football has never been so exciting since the days of yore at Wembley Stadium. :smile:
Click to expand...

Glad someone is being entertained by Scottish Football :hello:
 
AndyRM

AndyRM

XOXO
Location
North Shields
Eddy said:
Glad someone is being entertained by Scottish Football :hello:
Click to expand...

Harsh (though slightly fair).
 
Pro Tour Punditry

Pro Tour Punditry

Guru
Eddy said:
Ironic post of the year :thumbsup:
Click to expand...

You've already demonstrated you have not a clue about "hate crime" in your attempts to make it out that your team's version of hatred was based on ethnicity, nor the slightest degree of self-awareness regarding your team and it's history of loyalist bigotry and how this is viewed by others.

tug shouts "lies", you shout "victim". It's a poor double act.
 
U

User6179

Guest
Marmion said:
You've already demonstrated you have not a clue about "hate crime" in your attempts to make it out that your team's version of hatred was based on ethnicity, nor the slightest degree of self-awareness regarding your team and it's history of loyalist bigotry and how this is viewed by others.

tug shouts "lies", you shout "victim". It's a poor double act.
Click to expand...

You seem to think I defend Bigotry and sectarianism , I do not , it is a cancer in the Rangers support that needs to be removed !!!
In your post you called Loyalists Scum , whether they are Rangers supporters has nothing to do with it, if you read the hate laws it comes down to whether a Loyalist is an identifiable ethnic group
which I would say is open to debate if you read the definition of ethnic group.

For the record I am not a loyalist and voted yes to Scottish independence .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
mr messy

mr messy

Veteran
Location
Sunny? Glasgow, the friendly city...
Eddy said:
My theory is Whyte was brought in by the bank who got 18 million of the 22 million they were owed back , this seems very odd unless they knew Whyte was coming in to liquidate Rangers , would Whyte not try to pay less for the 22 million or even just pay off say 5 million of debt , why pay 18 million when the bank know they will be lucky to get a million if Rangers go into administration .
Click to expand...
Whyte did/does mix in "interesting" circles.......
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom