stowie said:At a junction close to where I live, cars jump the amber and the red all the time. It delays the cars turning right in the junction, who then cross whilst the pedestrian phase is going. Thus the real losers in this are the pedestrians trying to cross the road - especially those that cannot cross quickly.
stowie said:I think the fact that cyclist RLJ tends to happen when the lights have been red a while seems to annoy motorists, who then don't equate the jumping of the lights after a green has turned to amber and red as the same thing.
Not bikes!
I challenge you all next week to watch cars at junctions. It's amazing if you do at how many jump the reds.
A couple of times people at work have commented on cyclists RLJing, and I've suggested that they watch the cars. One of them came back a few days later to say that I'd got a point.
Not that two wrongs make a right, of course.
Tynan said:cars tend to do it late, using the lag between lights
cyclists tend to blow through them in cold blood at any time
not the same thing
Tynan said:cars tend to do it late, using the lag between lights
cyclists tend to blow through them in cold blood at any time
not the same thing
hackbike 666 said:Agreed.
thomas said:I do agree...it could be argued that what some cyclists do is safer, as it could suggest they look before jumping it...where as someone just shooting through on the amber probably hasn't checked that it is actually clear and just assumes it is.
I have some sympathy with this view - except that 1am on an empty road is exactly when a drunk pedestrian is likely to try wandering across without looking.There are times when I couldn't care if anyone RLJed though (like at 1 in the morning if the road is empty).