KneesUp
Guru
I was looking at my child's Map of the World last night, and thinking that, were it not for all the things that stop me from doing so, it'd be nice to take a world tour , which led to wondering what route I might take.
I'd head east first I think, that seems most logical - so from here (Yorkshire) I suppose I'd head to Hull, then to Holland, then bimble through western Europe - but then you get to a whole load of places I'm not keen to go and the Foreign Office aren't keen on you visiting either - the Ukraine looks dangerous to the east and I certainly wouldn't fancy the Turkey - Iran route. But once you got past that it seems the FO think almost everywhere in South America is dangerous, and loads of places in East Asia, like parts of the Phillipines, bits of Malaysia, some of Papua New Guinea. And it seems that you can't get through Africa without passing through some hot spots wither. I couldn't find a route - no matter how circuitous, that I'd be happy to follow.
If you had the time, money and lack of commitments, is it something you'd consider, and if so, what route would you take?
I'd head east first I think, that seems most logical - so from here (Yorkshire) I suppose I'd head to Hull, then to Holland, then bimble through western Europe - but then you get to a whole load of places I'm not keen to go and the Foreign Office aren't keen on you visiting either - the Ukraine looks dangerous to the east and I certainly wouldn't fancy the Turkey - Iran route. But once you got past that it seems the FO think almost everywhere in South America is dangerous, and loads of places in East Asia, like parts of the Phillipines, bits of Malaysia, some of Papua New Guinea. And it seems that you can't get through Africa without passing through some hot spots wither. I couldn't find a route - no matter how circuitous, that I'd be happy to follow.
If you had the time, money and lack of commitments, is it something you'd consider, and if so, what route would you take?