Origamist
Legendary Member
BM, you’ve lost me. You accuse me of being “wrong” but don’t qualify the charge.
Do you mean my opinion on 4ft usually being sufficient when you pass a parked vehicle (which I have consistently maintained and which my previous posts attest to – see the links in post 74)?
Or do you think I am wrong about the passing distance given to the Blue van? As I’ve said, I think it’s around the 3ft mark, it could be more though (ie I could be WRONG), say 3 and half foot, it might even be almost 4ft – but I’m unconvinced by that figure (BTW, I agree with Jon that the lane looks about 12-13ft wide, but we’re all guestimating passing distances and it is indeed a bit silly). However, 3-4ft is still in the door zone and that is what is important, don’t you see?
Where the discussion is not silly is that it has made Jon consider his passing distances (and possibly others), which is part of the reason for examining cycling cam films - they can used as an educational tool for other cyclists.
Finally, I enjoy Jon’s vids and posts - he argues his case cogently and with courtesy. If Jon wants to drop-kick me out of the discussion he only needs to say he checked the van, saw no occupants and was therefore happy to cycle in the door zone
Do you mean my opinion on 4ft usually being sufficient when you pass a parked vehicle (which I have consistently maintained and which my previous posts attest to – see the links in post 74)?
Or do you think I am wrong about the passing distance given to the Blue van? As I’ve said, I think it’s around the 3ft mark, it could be more though (ie I could be WRONG), say 3 and half foot, it might even be almost 4ft – but I’m unconvinced by that figure (BTW, I agree with Jon that the lane looks about 12-13ft wide, but we’re all guestimating passing distances and it is indeed a bit silly). However, 3-4ft is still in the door zone and that is what is important, don’t you see?
Where the discussion is not silly is that it has made Jon consider his passing distances (and possibly others), which is part of the reason for examining cycling cam films - they can used as an educational tool for other cyclists.
Finally, I enjoy Jon’s vids and posts - he argues his case cogently and with courtesy. If Jon wants to drop-kick me out of the discussion he only needs to say he checked the van, saw no occupants and was therefore happy to cycle in the door zone
