I took a massively unscientific approach to this question.
I happened to have a 50-tooth chainring with little wear and decided to use it for the fixie. So I skimmed the views of fixed-riding people in similar terrain and settled on gearing of 68-70". The chainring I already owned meant buying a 19-tooth sprocket to achieve that. Hey Presto!
I get the impression that many fixies are built up from odds and ends at minimal cost, so this may be how most chainring/sprocket sizes are chosen. I quite like the fact that my fixie works despite being slightly absurd. Too much thought and planning would somehow diminish the purity.
As to the other matter: I read a lot about skid patches and it simply wasn't me. A rear brake represents little weight penalty and on the hills where I ride I'd be mad (at my skill level) to rely on my legs to slow the rear wheel from speed.
I think the skidology fascination may be an urban thing. As soon as I was old enough to buy my own bicycle tyres, skidding the rear wheel lost its allure.
I happened to have a 50-tooth chainring with little wear and decided to use it for the fixie. So I skimmed the views of fixed-riding people in similar terrain and settled on gearing of 68-70". The chainring I already owned meant buying a 19-tooth sprocket to achieve that. Hey Presto!
I get the impression that many fixies are built up from odds and ends at minimal cost, so this may be how most chainring/sprocket sizes are chosen. I quite like the fact that my fixie works despite being slightly absurd. Too much thought and planning would somehow diminish the purity.
As to the other matter: I read a lot about skid patches and it simply wasn't me. A rear brake represents little weight penalty and on the hills where I ride I'd be mad (at my skill level) to rely on my legs to slow the rear wheel from speed.
I think the skidology fascination may be an urban thing. As soon as I was old enough to buy my own bicycle tyres, skidding the rear wheel lost its allure.