Maybe now is a good time to ask a question that has been puzzling me for a long time. Should the word "so" be preceded by a comma or a semicolon at the start of a clause? It's not
and, or, but, while or
yet. I'm not really sure whether it usually introduces a dependent clause. It tends to get used like
therefore which introduces an independent clause, and thus is preceded by a semicolon.
I had to get up at dawn; therefore I went to bed early.
Therefore seems clumsy and over the top.
I had to get up at dawn; so I went to bed early.
Semicolon looks wrong; besides wouldn't
so be redundant?
I had to get up at dawn, so I went to bed early.
Looks right, but is it?
So I went to bed early, I had to get up at dawn.
Switched the clauses around, but now it doesn't make sense, which it should if the comma was introducing a dependent clause.
I went to bed early, because I had to get up at dawn.
Because does take a comma because it does introduce a dependent clause.
Because I had to get up at dawn, I went to bed early.
Switching the clauses around still makes sense.
This seems to indicate that "so" should take a semicolon, but it seems too small a word. I'm troubled
