Shakespeare and stuff

Status
Not open for further replies.
Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

cisamcgu

Legendary Member
Location
Merseyside-ish
It is an expectation thing, and the expectation was derived from the advertising. Mozart or Shakespeare - if you go presuming it is one thing, and find out it is different, then I think you have cause to complain.
 

rich p

ridiculous old lush
Location
Brighton
So, who won the argument?
I cba to read the whole thread...
...is Bill the Bard shite or not?
 

srw

It's a bit more complicated than that...
Yes, the music is the thing, but Mozart on a banjo is NOT Mozart with a "classic" orchestra ... and therein lies the rub :smile:
On the other hand Shakespeare is Shakespeare is Shakespeare - whatever the costume.

What cunobelin is objecting to is more like going to a Mozart concert where the poster showed the first and second violins on the left, and discovering when you got there that the seconds had been placed on the right. Or where the poster showed steel strings and you discover that the orchestra is actually using gut.
 
It is an expectation thing, and the expectation was derived from the advertising. Mozart or Shakespeare - if you go presuming it is one thing, and find out it is different, then I think you have cause to complain.

Don't bother... Reasonable actions are not acceptable to some........The lies and ill informed claims in the reply to your post illustrate just how desperate some are
 
Last edited:
On the other hand Shakespeare is Shakespeare is Shakespeare - whatever the costume.

What cunobelin is objecting to is more like going to a Mozart concert where the poster showed the first and second violins on the left, and discovering when you got there that the seconds had been placed on the right. Or where the poster showed steel strings and you discover that the orchestra is actually using gut.
SRW is merely posting lies and ill informed tripe
 
Last edited:

srw

It's a bit more complicated than that...
I'm wondering now how the Portsmouth Sinfonia ever got away with it.
The same way that One Direction do.

This has tickled a vague memory in the back of my mind about a legal case brought against one of the endless stream of manufactured pop bands. If memory serves, a disgruntled punter was miffed to discover that the show she'd been to see wasn't the "artists" singing live, but was actually the "artists" miming to a pre-recorded track, so she sued. And if really rusty memory serves, the courts found for the pop group - the advert of the "artists" singing didn't actually imply that they would be singing.
 

Diggs

Veteran
I went to a pretty awful school but was lucky to have one of those genuinely inspiring teachers, who left me loving literature and Shakespeare particularly. Have watched it since then from modern day Henry V to comedies performed by amateur company in Romford parks
 

srw

It's a bit more complicated than that...
The same way that One Direction do.

This has tickled a vague memory in the back of my mind about a legal case brought against one of the endless stream of manufactured pop bands. If memory serves, a disgruntled punter was miffed to discover that the show she'd been to see wasn't the "artists" singing live, but was actually the "artists" miming to a pre-recorded track, so she sued. And if really rusty memory serves, the courts found for the pop group - the advert of the "artists" singing didn't actually imply that they would be singing.
No - I can't find anything like that. Google found this report of someone successfully suing because The Sound of Music was performed to a prerecorded backing track - although Tom Service points out that the case didn't set a precedent, and there are still dozens of musicals like that around the place. I was also reminded (how could I have forgotten) of Marni Nixon, who provided the singing voice for dozens of film roles.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom