While I don't want to start an argument about whether or not it deserved red (I think it did), what happened to the rule that you could only cite someone if the ref had missed it? The ref obviously believed he had dealt with this and therefore it shouldn't really be referred to the citing committee or have I missed something (it wouldn't be the first time).
iirc when citing was first introduced this was the case. then the rules at elite level changed to enable stuff the ref saw but didn't handle to the right outcome in the opinion of the citing commissioner. This one is made superficially complex because the YC was on the AR's recommendation; the ref didn't see the incident. But if we read the regs....
From IRB Regulations.... (NB NOT Laws of the Game)
Section 17.6 Citing
17.6.2 When a Citing Commissioner is appointed, the following policy shall apply:
(a) Citing Commissioners shall be entitled to cite a player for any act or acts of Illegal and/or Foul Play which in the opinion of the Citing Commissioner warranted the Player concerned being Ordered Off;
(b) Citing Commissioners may cite Players for an act or acts of Illegal and/or Foul Play even where such act or acts may have been detected by the referee and/or touch judge and which may have been the subject of action taken by the referee and/or touch judge. A Citing Commissioner may not, however, cite a Player for an act or acts of Illegal and/or Foul Play in respect of which the Player has been Ordered Off;
(c) A Player may be cited by the Citing Commissioner if he has been Temporarily Suspended. Such citing may be made in respect of the incident or incidents for which the Player was Temporarily
Suspended or otherwise;
What else will happen? The assistant referee will get a massive bollocking from his referee's coach and assessor for this as it was a game outcome influencing error. St Wayne will also get a ticking off and may even issue one of his own, the golden rule of being an AR being "Don't make the ref look like a ****"
Personally I think the system of post-match justice, in both Rugby and Soccer is a bit lame. What consolation is it to team A (Ireland) that a player from Team F (Wales) won't play teams B thru E in the next few weeks?