Has been reported in the Daily Mail too. Both papers had loads of comments stating that the cyclist in question is:
-blind
-arrogant
-"shouldnt be on the pavement!" (despite the fact he may have been riding around a pedestrian, the Mail article was unclear when I read it yesterday)
- "a stupid scientist, like those climate lot, and should lose his job" (paraphrased, wonder if the comment is still there)
- Looks like that bloke from The Royal Family or something..?
-"shouldnt be on the road" (WTF people, this is about a cyclepath, or are they deliberately obtuse)
-"No point blaming walkers, who are scared for thir loves dodging the cyclists." (on the BEP site, didnt Cheryl Cole sing that in her recent single?

)
- and finally, paraphrased, that "its his own fault, should have been wearing a helmet". He hurt his face, not the top of his noggin. I've split a lip and chin despite wearing a helmet, I can see how he did, even if he was wearing one.
My view on this - what a waste of money installing bollards. The council there must have more money that sense, or were they deliberately wasting Cycling England money on this?