Because he was throwing insults around, some of which were deleted before the locking.How is this any different to @glenn forger 's thread which was locked because his post contained a link and an image but no contribution from him to construct a discussion? This poster doesn't even return to his 'threads'.
GC
Because he was throwing insults around, some of which were deleted before the locking.
Take that up with Sean. He couldn't probably be bothered to write an essay explaining why it was locked. Take it from me multiple posts were edited/deleted.None of that was cited in Shaun's reasoning for locking:
https://www.cyclechat.net/threads/how-the-media-pick-a-victim.183235/post-3783036
GC
Take that up with Sean. He couldn't probably be bothered to write an essay explaining why it was locked. Take it from me multiple posts were edited/deleted.
Like I say, his manner was somewhat unpleasant - though I'm sure he would say the same about me. It was probably locked for that too as all he did was insult anyone who responded to it and Shaun probably had enough. I am sure that had a bearing though not mentioned in the final summary.I know there were posts deleted, I'm not referring to that. Shaun's criticism of Glenn's OP is what I'm referring to; it would seem this and other threads by Sue Perb are of the same category.
GC
Take it up with the Mods.