Steel or alloy frames?

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

avalon

Guru
Location
Australia
I was wondering what type of frames people are choosing to tour on now that alloy frames are so cheap and readily available. My own preference, if I were looking for something new, would to be to stick with what I know and choose steel because of its reliability and ease of repair if it were to break.
I'm still using, as my wet weather/winter bike, a frame that I have had since 1980 and have never had any problems with it. The only maintenance it gets is a very occasional clean and a spray of oil down the tubes when they are exposed for repairs or replacement of other components, and it still, after 32 years, has no internal rust.
 

samid

Guru
Location
Toronto, Canada
I prefer steel bikes for the looks. I have a few, my oldest built up bike is a 1947 Hetchins, it was repainted about 20-25 years ago and still looks great, no rust to be seen anywhere. I also tour on a steel bike.
 

Nigeyy

Legendary Member
Aaah well... you might as well ask Shimano or Campy? Marmite or Vegemite? VHS or Betamax? (the last one was for those of us who are older)

Just my opinion: I don't think it really matters for the vast majority of us given the touring we do, and not for material riding characteristics. For riding characteristics, what really matters is the frame design, the components you use and your attributes and riding environment. I've used frames of different material with undesirable characteristics in both. Material is by far from the sole factor in how a frame behaves; there's too much else that comes into play.

Concerning repairability, I also don't put too much stock in this. Sure steel is better for repair, but let's ask this question: the next time you are touring and your frame breaks, what would you do? (assuming you survived the frame breakage or failure that is without a tour ending injury!) What if the frame broke because of rust? Would you want the frame still repaired anyway? If it's in a country where welders are few and far apart, would you trust the repair? Could you even find a welder who is skilled enough for a bike frame? Would it even be within a 30 mile radius? Let's even say you could find an appropriate welder close by -remember that the repair will result in paint damage -which is costly to restore, too! Would it come out cheaper than buying a cheap bike and putting racks on it? (I'd also bet you can find more places that sell bikes than welders, too). Let's not also discount the fact that you could even get a bike (or frame) shipped to you in many places -and those places that are so remote probably don't have welders in that next settlement over the hill either. One last point: what if your frame is warranteed? Do you think the warrantee would hold given a non-specialist welder getting their hands on it?

Of course, there are times where having a frame that is repairable is an absolute advantage -however, my thought is given what you need for a repair and the likelihood of finding it, I'd take the risk of getting a decent non-steel frame and components (regardless of the material!).

For full disclosure: my touring bike is steel, but I'd also be quite happy with any decent quality touring frame of any material. I also tour in "developed" countries and if my frame ever broke, I'd either buy a new bike to continue or rig up a fix if it was a rack eyelet.
 
OP
OP
avalon

avalon

Guru
Location
Australia
Aaah well... you might as well ask Shimano or Campy? Marmite or Vegemite? VHS or Betamax? (the last one was for those of us who are older)
But many people at the time were of the opinion that Betamax was the better quality recording system. It didn't stop it becoming obsolete and every one knows Campag is far superior to anything else that has ever been or ever will be made in the cycling world^_^ .
 
OP
OP
avalon

avalon

Guru
Location
Australia
every one knows Campag is far superior to anything else that has ever been or ever will be made in the cycling world^_^ .quote said:
Having said that, Shimano may be a better choice for a touring bike because you can buy compatible parts throughout the world.
 

Drago

Legendary Member
Quality is a 7 letter word... Shimano. I wouldn't tour abroad with anything else kitting my bike.
 

Yellow7

Über Member
Location
Milton Keynes
Time for my tuppence. 'Quality' does not mean good, the word that preceeds it defines that, or not; 'Good quality' or 'bad quality'. In my view yes, good quality is a seven letter word, Rohloff.

As far as the original question steel is more forgiving than aluminium therefore minimising material stress, and reduces the chance of any problems on a pro-longed multi-country tour. Aluminium, being a relatively soft, and over-rated, is ok in designs where strength is not required, I'm not saying it's not suitable on a bike design but I woudln't travel outside Europe on one. Titanium offers the best of both worlds as it's as strong as steel but the same weight as aluminium, just a same about the price!
 

vernon

Harder than Ronnie Pickering
Location
Meanwood, Leeds
For full disclosure: my touring bike is steel, but I'd also be quite happy with any decent quality touring frame of any material. I also tour in "developed" countries and if my frame ever broke, I'd either buy a new bike to continue or rig up a fix if it was a rack eyelet.

I've had both steel and aluminium framed tourers and they both met my needs extremely well.

My steel framed Dawes Galaxy suffered from a fractured rear drop out in Orleans in France. I could have spent time trying to find somewhere that effect a trustworthy repair but, as the bike would be in need of a new drive train, wheels and a frame respray after any repair I decided that buying a bike was a better value solution.

This marked my entry into aluminium framed touring bikes when I bought a Decathlon Riverside 7 hybrid complete with mudguards, lights and pannier rack for less that I was going to spend refurbishing a ten year year old bike. The bike didn't let me down and is now owned by a pal.

At the end of the day it's down to personal taste which material one chooses for a tourer. There's some nice looking aluminium frames tourers out there and there's equally nice steel framed bikes too. I have returned to a steel framed bike only because it appeals to me, is bespoke and is unique. I am uninterested in the steel is real argument as I've not detected any difference in ride quality between the two materials.

Others might disagree....
 
Top Bottom