surosa audax comp or toledo?

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

zac 64

Active Member
Hi, I am thinking of buying a surosa comp. audax for general riding and prehaps light touring. The sora model is £599 and the Tiagra (pro comp) model is £699, Is it worth spending the extra money on tiagra components? Also, I am 6ft 1 with a 32" leg so would a 58cm frame be the right size? Thanks for your help.
 

Scoosh

Velocouchiste
Moderator
Location
Edinburgh
One of the main differences between Sora and Tiagra is in the buttons/levers used for changing gears. I can't really explain it but am aware of it :blush: ! (I have SRAM Rival)

Someone else should be along to tell you the reality.

I advised my wife to get Tiagra.
 
I've got a Sora equipped bike and a 105 equipped (the on up from Tiagra) For starters the 105 hood is more comfy than Sora, I guess the Tiagra will be too. Secondly the Sora as Scoosh says changes in one direction with the brake lever and in another direction with a thumb shifter; this is only good for rapidly changing gear on the hoods. Whereas the 105 (the Tiagra is the same I believe) changes one way with the brake lever and the other way with a small paddle lever behind the brake lever; this means you can rapidly shift gears whether on the hoods or drops. There's probably a weight saving between the two but it doesn't really bother me. IMO it would be worth the extra if you can afford it.

I'm smaller than you 5 foot 9 and 1/4; and bike fits recommend 56cm for me. The last one I had done was on line this fit system.

Good Luck :smile:
 

GrumpyGregry

Here for rides.
6' 2" and the 58cm Surosa Toledo fits me fine (confirmed by a spesh bike fit session). Campag Veloce on mine.
 

RedBike

New Member
Location
Beside the road
Although things have apparently improved Sora brakes never used to inspire much confidence. There always seemed to be a lot of flex.Although you could improve the brakes no end simply by switching the pads over to a good cartridge design.
 
Top Bottom