Sausage butty for the win then ! We've some shocking cycle lanes, then certain areas have had millions invested. I think I still prefer the bits of worn paint on the side of roads locally. We have one that is more like a pump track as it crosses lots of driveways, the council didn't think to flatten the lot. You can get 'air' off them. Ridden it once on the road bike and it was exceptionally unpleasant, even at a slow speed ! Had I taken the MTB, that might have been fun.
Well, the sausage as consumed "straight" currently to satisfy the low-carb mandate but yeah - a welcome breakfast!
Most cycling "provision" is a bloody joke, isn't it? There are a few round here that are as you describe too; I suspect making it all flat would cost far more than any council would want to spend on a box-ticking exercise to appease the frothy-mouthed car self-gratification artists.
We also have those that have a surface akin to that of a '90s Baghdad airfield, simply disappear into nothing, are obstructed by various bits of road furniture / parked cars / peds, put you in direct conflict with other vehicles (such as the chicanes with cut-throughs for cyclists that intersect perfectly with the exit line for other traffic)..
The lastest dose of ridiculousness appears to be the council's initiative to randomly paint bike symbols in the middle of roads - which means what exactly? There are bikes? Bikes have priority? Bikes are allowed here? What does that tell drivers about all the other bits of road without this intriguing, taxpayer-funded graffiti - that bikes shouldn't be using them?
I feel a pointed email to the council coming on..