i dont know what went wrong there, for the first four miles, it was hard work just keeping in touch with AAC and Bill. AAAC giving me a tow for sections-cheers. Then went the first dip arrived my resistance became easier and i was able to cycle in top gear producing 1000watts uphill, after that it was stupid. i got off the bike to see if i was still plug in- ok
I have saved it for you lot to assess, dont put it in the league though
i dont know what went wrong there, for the first four miles, it was hard work just keeping in touch with AAAC and Bill. AAAC giving me a tow for sections-cheers. Then when the first dip arrived my resistance became easier and i was able to cycle in top gear producing 1000watts uphill, that was stupid. i got off the bike to see if i was still plug in- ok
I have saved it for you lot to assess, dont put it in the league though
Great Finish Bill and AAAC![]()
Well it was great to finish, that's for sure. I wasn't so happy with that ride as the blue numbers were too easy to take advantage of. One of them just kept going at the same speed as the previous much lesser gradient and was like a slingshot that just kept on giving. The only way I could stop it was by using the brake to come to a dead stop. I wasn't sure if Bridgy and AAAC had had the same benefits so I was reluctant to go as quick as I could up the hill and at the end I think it was a competition between me and AAAC to see who could go the slowest. I don't think I could have surfed the blue anywhere near as quick ass Andy did it though.
i dont know what went wrong there, for the first four miles, it was hard work just keeping in touch with AAAC and Bill. AAAC giving me a tow for sections-cheers. Then when the first dip arrived my resistance became easier and i was able to cycle in top gear producing 1000watts uphill, that was stupid. i got off the bike to see if i was still plug in- ok
I have saved it for you lot to assess, dont put it in the league though
I didn't have anything like that Bill. Uphill speeds did go blue but as I said earlier, this didn't seem to mean anything as the speed dropped (or increased) instantly to match the power I was putting in- no idea what difference the blue was meant to make!
Well it was great to finish, that's for sure. I wasn't so happy with that ride as the blue numbers were too easy to take advantage of. One of them just kept going at the same speed as the previous much lesser gradient and was like a slingshot that just kept on giving. The only way I could stop it was by using the brake to come to a dead stop. I wasn't sure if Bridgy and AAAC had had the same benefits so I was reluctant to go as quick as I could up the hill and at the end I think it was a competition between me and AAAC to see who could go the slowest. I don't think I could have surfed the blue anywhere near as quick ass Andy did it though.
As I said to Bridgy I had a huge slingshoty moment on Thursday going into the final climb. I deliberately powered into the climb and my speed dropped really slowly in comparison to Bridgy and I actually caught and passed him whilst it was occurring so I backed off and let him catch me again to try and make up for it all be it meant I was resting (comparatively).
This whole blue number thing is all over the place. I think they need to go back a few steps to the resistance = gradient start point and have a go at re-introducing realism again but differently. It seems to be that they have in terms of database's created something not knowing what they wanted out of it and then bolted on extra's to obtain the results they wanted. The more bolt on's you add the more unpredictable and un-flexible the database becomes.