PBancroft
Senior Member
- Location
- Winchester
Lately I've been rather struck by the idea of a "People's Bike" as a kind of antithesis to the cheapo cheese bikes that some supermarkets and catalogues sell. I'm fairly sure that it must be possible to build a no-frills but sturdy, safe comfortable bike for the price many of these sell for, and still make a profit.
I'm sure many of the BSOs on the market are attractive to consumers who don't know what they're looking for.
So... assuming that you were able to purchase parts at trade prices, and your own time doesn't cost anything, could you build a robust ridable bike for around £100? That price isn't set in stone, but just a mental guideline... What would you cut out, and what would you lower in spec? This is entirely hypothetical, of course.
I think the one must-have I'd include on a budget bike is a set of lights (hub dynamo?) - perhaps controversially, I guess considering they rarely feature on a standard basic setup. I have a theory that this would help identify the bike as a method of transport for more than the occasional pootle in summer, and might prevent accidents where inexperienced riders go out without them. Am well aware that this would probably racket the price up though.
What would I leave out? Suspension certainly. I'd be tempted to go the fixed gear route, simply because it would be a little bit more maintenance free for the end user, though I don't know if it would actually be cheaper in the short run. I'd look for a bike most people would be able to use both on and off road, so not slim tyres, but not knobblies either. Hybrid would be the way I'd go.
With a people's bike, I'd want to keep costs down by sticking to a standard frame - I really don't think I woman's frame means that much anymore, but it might do to a new, unsure consumer. That said, I would still lump for the diamond frame.
Any other suggestions... where have I gone wrong?
I'm sure many of the BSOs on the market are attractive to consumers who don't know what they're looking for.
So... assuming that you were able to purchase parts at trade prices, and your own time doesn't cost anything, could you build a robust ridable bike for around £100? That price isn't set in stone, but just a mental guideline... What would you cut out, and what would you lower in spec? This is entirely hypothetical, of course.
I think the one must-have I'd include on a budget bike is a set of lights (hub dynamo?) - perhaps controversially, I guess considering they rarely feature on a standard basic setup. I have a theory that this would help identify the bike as a method of transport for more than the occasional pootle in summer, and might prevent accidents where inexperienced riders go out without them. Am well aware that this would probably racket the price up though.
What would I leave out? Suspension certainly. I'd be tempted to go the fixed gear route, simply because it would be a little bit more maintenance free for the end user, though I don't know if it would actually be cheaper in the short run. I'd look for a bike most people would be able to use both on and off road, so not slim tyres, but not knobblies either. Hybrid would be the way I'd go.
With a people's bike, I'd want to keep costs down by sticking to a standard frame - I really don't think I woman's frame means that much anymore, but it might do to a new, unsure consumer. That said, I would still lump for the diamond frame.
Any other suggestions... where have I gone wrong?