Are you Henry Ford?I find it hard enough to get going, why would you want to contemplate stopping?
Are you Henry Ford?I find it hard enough to get going, why would you want to contemplate stopping?
the real question should be... Will I get there?Will tomorrow get here?
If it doesn't, you won't.the real question should be... Will I get there?
But i look 25... ishYes. If you're older than 25 you're too old for skinny jeans.
I'll tell you the answer to that tomorrow.Why is it never tomorrow, always today.
Obviously someone who hates him. Which narrows it down to pretty much the entire planet bar a few mouth-breathers.Who is Donald Trump's barber?
Why is it never tomorrow, always today.
From starting at rest. S=0.5 a t(squared)If I wanted to travel to a theoretical nearest habitable planet, let's say it's 1000 light years away. I'd want to accelerate at 1g to the half way point and then turn my ship around so that I could decelerate at 1g.
How long would it take me to get there?
From starting at rest. S=0.5 a t(squared)
s = distance, a = accelerateion
t = sqrt((2s/a))
Set s as half the distance and then double it for each half of the journey.
You’ll find it easier to convert to SI units (m, s etc). Not in front of PC but there’s everything you’ll need.
You're gonna hit some weird relativistic effects as you approach light speed...From starting at rest. S=0.5 a t(squared)
s = distance, a = accelerateion
t = sqrt((2s/a))
Set s as half the distance and then double it for each half of the journey.
You’ll find it easier to convert to SI units (m, s etc). Not in front of PC but there’s everything you’ll need.
Ah. Yes this is Newtonian physics but as you say, if one is approaching the speed of light then time will slow down.Mmm, I think you may have missed a key word in Mickle's question. "How long would it take you to get there". To work that out you need to consider at least special (I think you can ignore general if only 1g) relativity. I'd need to draw pictures - but I think it'll be a lot shorter than you'd think, but could be wrong as I studied this some 35 years ago.