Nope, nothing from my second email. I kinda lost interest, I figure it’s a no win situation for anybody trying to counter it. Say you managed to get the ruling overturned with a big public fight then in the distant future some kid has an almighty bad crash whilst not wearing a helmet and was badly hurt, however remote this may be, how would this reflect to the masses? How would they feel about the person who got the “helmet compulsion” rule lifted? I know how some people think about it (pro helmet) who responded to my Facebook post regarding this matter, some quite vitriolic comments from friends who haven’t got a clue regarding helmet efficacy or “evidence”, and they are my friends! This is such a dodgy area as -to the uneducated, we are trying to stop a perfectly reasonable “safety measure”, they just don’t get it, much like I didn’t “get it” when I first got involved with this debate, they think we are mentally deranged if you question the wearing of a helmet as it’s obvious init- they must be a good thing, right?