darkstar said:
Surely riders adapt to the conditions and equipment available to them?
True but 1 difference has happened which changes the type of rider likely to win.
Better equipment/nutrition/
drugs/etc would
apply across the board, so someone with Coppi's talent born today would still be in the top bracket.
The thing I'm referring to is race radios.
Prior to these riders had to use their brains and use split second decisions on when to attack, how to deploy their domestiques etc.
This necessity for cycling intelligence has now gone as a factor to win a race. Domestiques are just pawns in the hands of the directeur sportifs
You can therefore say Coppi would still be great today, but not necessarily the other way round.
Probably Lance would have been a very astute rider actually although we'll never know how he'd do without Bruyneel in his ear every second of the race