The Metric Century (100KM) A Month Challenge ChatZone

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Ajax Bay

Guru
Location
East Devon
I got mine done for August yesterday.
Well done and great photos. Is this your first metric century this year? :welcome:;)
 
I’ve failed to do a metric century in August so I’m out of this year’s challenge.

The first half of the month was impossibly hot (rides in the mornings and evenings but not the afternoons). I’ve had a problem with ants in the kitchen since the 16th August and it’s proved to be a huge distraction. Apart from being unable to prepare food and cook, the insecticide made me ill (I used it sparingly – but not sparingly enough). It’s all left me in a state of nervous exhaustion.

As the remainder of August looks like being a mixture of gales and thunderstorms, there’s no chance of getting a ride done – and I’m still dealing with the effing ants.

It’s disappointing … but I have done 11 metric centuries this year (8 in this challenge plus 3 more in the Lunacy Distance challenge) which is far more than I’ve managed in any other year – and that’s largely down to my participation in this challenge.

I’m going to re-post my 8 rides from this challenge into the 2025 Lunacy Distance challenge.

I don’t know if I’ll enter this challenge again next year. I’ll be 74 in 2026 and, whilst I still hope to continue to ride metric centuries, it really takes a toll on my aging body in the summer months. I think the Lunacy Distance challenge may well be better suited to my circumstances.

Good luck to everyone for the remainder of the year.
 

MadMalx

Well-Known Member
Birthday (+ a day) ride yesterday. Lovely solo ride in the Dales - big contrast in temperature beween cloudy Wensleydale and Sunny Wharfdale. October ride done, and exceed my new age in miles.
Also started toward secondary goal - exceeding my age with my annual metric Eddington. Managed this narrowly last two years by accident, so decided I need to keep this up. Should be ok for the next few years but will get just that bit harder each year.

IMG_5015.jpeg


IMG_5016.jpeg
 
That's a good goal - exceeding your age with your annual, metric Eddington. I may adopt that one too :-)
 
That's correct: 72 rides of over 72km within the space of the year, which is definitely properly challenging.

As to how to calculate it, I've yet to work out an elegant (easy!) method. Perhaps @MadMalx has a means? There are many sites / services which work out Eddington automatically based on records from services such as Strava (Veloviewer for example), but not on an annual basis, so far as I'm aware. Not that, over a year, it's especially onerous to just remove all sub-par rides from the total ride count I suppose.
 
Related to the above, a more sustainable goal around annual Eddington (sort of) is something like aiming for an annual Eddington defined by: 120 minus AGE. i.e. yours, @bluenotebob , would be 120-72=48. The major benefit of that is that it is conceivable that you can still do it at 80 years old, etc., whereas @MadMalx ' s one would need 80 x 80km, which sounds quite improbable; certainly *very* challenging. (Obviously, you can pick a different number from 120, that seems to me to be a viable one (though maybe I'm being unduly optimistic!).
 
Related to the above, a more sustainable goal around annual Eddington (sort of) is something like aiming for an annual Eddington defined by: 120 minus AGE. i.e. yours, @bluenotebob , would be 120-72=48.

Interesting suggestion. But it would conflict with trying to improve my Lifetime Eddingtons (Metric and Imperial).

I've managed 20 rides over 86km this year - which has helped me push up towards E Metric 83 (nearly there) and E Imperial 57 (still a long way to go).

Doing 48 rides over 48km wouldn't help my Lifetime Eddingtons at all ... but when I come to the realisation that these targets have become impossible to reach, then that would be a nice alternative target to aim for (although it would still be demanding at the age of 80 - a metric half-century on average once a week? .. well, perhaps).
 
Top Bottom