The Oxford Comma

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Angelfishsolo

A Velocipedian
If you ever have trouble remembering a minimal contrast for the final serial comma, a.k.a. the Oxford comma, here's a little visual help:
 

Attachments

  • OxfordComma.jpg
    OxfordComma.jpg
    40 KB · Views: 192

BrumJim

Forum Stalwart (won't take the hint and leave...)
Another Vampire Weekend thread?

View: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_i1xk07o4g
 

srw

It's a bit more complicated than that...
As a cartoon it's amusing. As a memory aid it's lousy - there's no reason to link the pictures to the position of the comma.
 

Yellow Fang

Legendary Member
Location
Reading
What if JFK and Stalin were strippers, but so were Mussolini and de Gaulle? Should it be:

'We invited the strippers, JFK, Stalin, Mussolini and de Gaulle', or
'We invited the strippers: JFK, Stalin, Mussolini and de Gaulle'.
 

swee'pea99

Squire
Why would you want to 'remember' the Oxford comma? It's an absurdity,never respected by more than a few, and fast sliding into well-merited obsolescence.
 

mr_hippo

Living Legend & Old Fart
The debate about the Oxford (or Harvard) comma has been going on for decades. Is it necessary? In my, never too humble. opinion – NO! Look at the following sentence:-

I had bacon and eggs and black pudding and sausage and mushrooms for breakfast.

As children, we learn that we do not need to put ‘and’ between every item in a list. We just need a small pause between each item apart from the last one. The ‘and’ just before the final item signifies that the following word is the last item in the list, all other items are ‘paused ’ by inserting a comma and dropping the ‘and’s so the sentence would be:-

I had bacon, eggs, black pudding, sausage and mushrooms for breakfast.

So in spoken English, the ‘and’s are replaced by pauses and in written English by commas. By inserting a final comma before the last ‘and’, you are saying “I had bacon and eggs and black pudding and sausage and and mushrooms for breakfast.” Is this what you want to say?

In the example ‘‘We invited the strippers, jfk[sic], and Stalin.”, the word order leaves a lot to be desired! By putting unnamed parties at the back of the list leads us to believe that JFK, Stalin and strippers were invited. “We invited JFK, Stalin and the strippers.” The problem in the original sentence lies with word order and not punctuation.
 

swee'pea99

Squire
It's simple. The Oxford comma, so called, has its uses. In long, rambly sentences it can aid clarity. But to insist that it always be used - that it is 'correct' - is nonsense on stilts, on a par with insisting that you must never split infinitives or start a sentence with 'and'. The kind of rule that serves only to keep humourless pedants who've never written a thing worth reading in their lives basking in smug superiority.

Compare:

Apples, pears and bananas.

Apples, pears, and bananas.

In what sense, in what way, is the second sentence preferable?

Punctuation is there to make it easier for the reader to grasp what's being said. If it's not doing that, it's just clutter. As ever, if you can get rid of it without causing problems, you should.
 
Top Bottom