cafebeard
Regular
- Location
- Stockton on Tees
I have just started a blog based on 4 years of research of racing cyclists in training for my PhD - I will post some links to my blog posts soon - if that OK ?
Blog linking is not really what CycleChat is about, we prefer it if you stay here and talk with us, particularly with a subject that sounds like it could be of interest and benefit to our membership to discuss and engage in conversation on.
I don't mind links as long as there's a little summary with it and we can discuss it here. I can understand why people prefer to keep their own blogs rather than post i all on a forum: too much of my old writing has been nuked from the internet when site owners die or close their forums (grr ITV cycling forum!). If the blog post links to the discussion here (as well as whatever comments discussion it has on its own site), it might help more people to discover this site, too. But I'm not @Moderators.Agree completely. Linking to a blog post simply invites the debate to move somewhere else, which in my mind is a little disingenuous. If the debate is worth having, discuss it on here. That won't get hits on the blog page though.
I could not agree more - my research is not about racing but about 'racing cyclists' in the training setting. The term ‘racing cyclist’ applied in my research is used as a general descriptor of the cyclists who comprise my research population, and whose level of cycling participation places them at different points on a continuum of racing cycling participation (created by me simply for the purposes of my research). - thesis extract: "The common denominator across the continuum is that all of the racing cyclists referred to in my work ride ‘road bicycles’ designed for racing which are generally lighter than other types of bicycle, and are equipped with: ‘drop’ handle bars; multiple gears; and, narrow high-pressure tyres" - This was a definition was required for academic readers of my thesis (my examiners) who have limited knowledge of cycling - unlike forum members. Bit of a long-winded reply but I hope it clarifies?You missed out the word 'racing' in your title. There's a whole lot more to cycling than racing.
Sorry if I have unintentionally breached blog etiquette. My purpose is to share my original and quite topical research with forum members - and enter in to discussion with them.I don't mind links as long as there's a little summary with it and we can discuss it here. I can understand why people prefer to keep their own blogs rather than post i all on a forum: too much of my old writing has been nuked from the internet when site owners die or close their forums (grr ITV cycling forum!). If the blog post links to the discussion here (as well as whatever comments discussion it has on its own site), it might help more people to discover this site, too. But I'm not @Moderators.
The debate is what is important to me too and I have no wish to appear disingenuous (bit harsh I think) I feel as if I come to the forum offering something that members would be keen to debate - here. I am offering my research up because don't want it to be hidden away behind the 'paywalls' of academic journals. I want to share it with people who I think will be interested - which in turn will provide me with connections to interested parties for future (potential) research engagements.Agree completely. Linking to a blog post simply invites the debate to move somewhere else, which in my mind is a little disingenuous. If the debate is worth having, discuss it on here. That won't get hits on the blog page though.
Often wondered what makes cyclists tick.![]()
The debate is what is important to me too and I have no wish to appear disingenuous (bit harsh I think) I feel as if I come to the forum offering something that members would be keen to debate - here. I am offering my research up because don't want it to be hidden away behind the 'paywalls' of academic journals. I want to share it with people who I think will be interested - which in turn will provide me with connections to interested parties for future (potential) research engagements.
^^^This.I don't mind links as long as there's a little summary with it and we can discuss it here. I can understand why people prefer to keep their own blogs rather than post i all on a forum: too much of my old writing has been nuked from the internet when site owners die or close their forums (grr ITV cycling forum!). If the blog post links to the discussion here (as well as whatever comments discussion it has on its own site), it might help more people to discover this site, too. But I'm not @Moderators.
At least most of us don't feel the need to leave scent marks while we're at it!I actually believe there's a deep anthropological explanation for sports like cycling, walking and skiing; it first struck me when I used to go mountain biking and I saw members of my club charging around the countryside like a pack of animals patrolling their territory. It is said that golf is actually a subliminal prey-chasing game, a super-formalised substitute for chasing a small animal around a lansdcape that has been manipulated to resemble the savannas where Mankind first began to roam. In the same way I believe that, aside from the enjoyment of exercise and the aesthetic pleasures of landscape, discovery, equipment and adventure, cyclists, walkers, skiers and runners actually satisfy a deep primeval urge to patrol their territory and mark out their boundaries.
You don't?At least most of us don't feel the need to leave scent marks while we're at it!
Really!? I'd have thought half the hedgerows of England would smell of fox, badger, dog and cyclist markings.At least most of us don't feel the need to leave scent marks while we're at it!